 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1875 - 630 str.
...of the property. Persons v. Persona, 250 . Whether a purchase in the name of a wife is a settlement or not is a question of pure intention, though presumed...the first instance to be a provision and settlement ; but any antecedent or cotemporaneous acts or facts may be received either to rebut or support the... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1914 - 768 str.
...purchase in the name of a wife is a settlement or not, is a question of pure Yetman c. Hedgemnn. S2 Eg. intention, though presumed in the first instance to be a provision and settlement, but any antecedent or contemporaneous acts or facts may be received, either to rebut or support the... | |
 | 1898 - 562 str.
...husband, by a trustee, who had held the property In trust for him, was an advancement, Is a question of Intention, though presumed In the first Instance to be a provision and settlement; and hence any antecedent or contemporaneous acts or facts may be received, either to rebnt or support... | |
 | Charles Ewing Green, New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1875 - 628 str.
...the property. Fersons v. .Persont, 250 i. Whether a purchase in the name of a wife is a settlement or not is a question of pure intention, though presumed...the first instance to be a provision and settlement ; but any antecedent or cotemporaneous acts or facts may be received either to rebut or support the... | |
 | Jairus Ware Perry - 1882 - 744 str.
...rebutted, and the inference of a trust will be established.4 § 147. Whether a purchase in the name of wife or child is an advancement or not, is a question of pure intention, 1 Grey v. Grey, 2 Swans. 600; Redington v. Redington, 3 Ridg. 190; Lamplugh v. Lamplugh, 1 P. Wms.... | |
 | 1899 - 986 str.
...parties. "Whether a purchase in the name of a wife и or child is an advancement or not Is a quesetlon of pure Intention, though presumed In • the first instance to be a provision and'settlernent Therefore any antecedent or contemporaneous acts or facts may be received, either to... | |
 | 1890 - 1148 str.
...parlies, the payment of the consideration may be supposed to be a gift to the nominal purchaser. 3. Whether a purchase in the name of a wife or child is nu advancement is a question of intention, though presumed in the first instance to bo a provision... | |
 | 1901 - 1134 str.
...testimony, if the same is clear and satisfactory. Thus it is said in Perry on Trusts (section 147): "Whether a purchase in the name of a wife or child...the first Instance, to be a provision and settlement Therefore any antecedent or contemporaneous acts or facts may be received either to rebut or support... | |
 | 1905 - 1204 str.
...take the beneficial interest. 15 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law (2d Ed.) pp. 1156-1164. Whether or not the purchase in the name of a wife or child is an advancement is a question of intention, and, where it is shown that at the time of the conveyance to the child... | |
 | 1898 - 1150 str.
...Dyer, 1 White & T. Lead. Cas. Eq. 345-347. Perry uses this language: "Whether a purchase in the name of wife or child is an advancement or not is a question...first instance, to be a provision and settlement. Therefore any antecedent or contemporaneous acts or facts may be received, either to rebut or support... | |
| |
Whether a purchase in the name of a wife or child is an advancement or not, is a question of pure intention, though presumed in the first instance to be a provision and settleOpinion of the Court. ment ; therefore, any antecedent or contemporaneous acts... 
