An Affair of State: The Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton

Přední strana obálky
Harvard University Press, 1. 7. 2009 - Počet stran: 288

President Bill Clinton’s year of crisis, which began when his affair with Monica Lewinsky hit the front pages in January 1998, engendered a host of important questions of criminal and constitutional law, public and private morality, and political and cultural conflict.

In a book written while the events of the year were unfolding, Richard Posner presents a balanced and scholarly understanding of the crisis that also has the freshness and immediacy of journalism. Posner clarifies the issues and eliminates misunderstandings concerning facts and the law that were relevant to the investigation by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and to the impeachment proceeding itself. He explains the legal definitions of obstruction of justice and perjury, which even many lawyers are unfamiliar with. He carefully assesses the conduct of Starr and his prosecutors, including their contacts with the lawyers for Paula Jones and their hardball tactics with Monica Lewinsky and her mother. He compares and contrasts the Clinton affair with Watergate, Iran–Contra, and the impeachment of Andrew Johnson, exploring the subtle relationship between public and private morality. And he examines the place of impeachment in the American constitutional scheme, the pros and cons of impeaching President Clinton, and the major procedural issues raised by both the impeachment in the House and the trial in the Senate. This book, reflecting the breadth of Posner’s experience and expertise, will be the essential foundation for anyone who wants to understand President Clinton’s impeachment ordeal.

Vyhledávání v knize

Vybrané stránky

Obsah

Introduction
1
1 The President s Conduct
16
2 Prosecution and Defense
59
3 The HistoryScopeand Form of Impeachment
95
4 MoralityPrivate and Public
133
5 Should President Clinton Have Been Impeachedand If Impeached Convicted?
170
6 The Kulturkampf
199
7 Lessons for the Future
217
8 The Balance Sheet
262
Acknowledgments
267
Index
269
Autorská práva

Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny

Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví

Oblíbené pasáže

Strana 143 - But, O, what form of prayer Can serve my turn ? Forgive me my foul murder...
Strana 38 - Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which...
Strana 178 - Terry Eastland, Energy in the Executive: The Case for the Strong Presidency (1992) (a Republican writing during a Republican Presidency). On the politically partisan character of Presidential studies, see Richard Rose, "Evaluating Presidents," in Researching the Presidency, note 3 above, at 453, 473-475.
Strana 25 - For the purposes of this deposition, a person engages in "sexual relations" when the person knowingly engages in or causes — 1. contact with the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person; 2.
Strana 145 - See also Sissela Bok, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life 176 (1978).
Strana 56 - Federal civil rights action brought against him; (3) prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a Federal judge in that civil rights action; and (4) his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action.
Strana 47 - ... ambiguous terms so that they may be understood in a different sense from that in which one understands them oneself/ On the same ground permission is given to mental reservation (restriction mentale) : ' One may swear that one has not done a thing which one has really done, by saying within oneself that one did not do it on a certain day, or before one was born...
Strana 149 - LITIGATION, n. A machine which you go into as a pig and come out of as a sausage.
Strana 73 - Starr's office has been accused of leaking some of the grand jury testimony, in violation of Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which forbids disclosure of matters before the grand jury unless necessary for law enforcement purposes.

Bibliografické údaje