 | United States. Supreme Court - 1826 - 518 str.
...rule settled in the Supreme Court of New- York in the case of Jackson v. Lawton, (10 Johns. Rep. 23.) We may, therefore, assume as the settled doctrine...face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in a Court of... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1826 - 522 str.
...rule settled in the Supreme Court of New- York in the case of Jackson v. Lawton, (10 Johns. Rep. 23.) We may, therefore, assume as the settled doctrine...face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in a Court of... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1862 - 658 str.
...after referring to the previous decisions, said, we may therefore assume as the settled doctrine of the court, that if a patent is absolutely void upon its...authority or prohibited by statute, or the State had 110 title, it may be impeached collaterally in a court of law in an action of ejectment. Assuming the... | |
 | 1874 - 778 str.
...Pac. Law Rep., Oct. 6, 1874. 2. WHEN PATENT MAY BE IMPEACHED COLLATERALLY. — If a patent is void on its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority...prohibited by statute, or the state had no title, it may be collaterally impeached in an action of ejectment. Ib. PLEADING AND PRACTICE. 1. APPEAL IN ADMIBALTY.... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1874 - 774 str.
...388, it was announced as the settled doctrine of the Court ' ' that if a patent is absolutely void on its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority,...prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may bo impeached collaterally in a Court of law in an action of ejectment." The same proposition is maintained... | |
 | Lorenzo Smith Boswell Sawyer, United States. Circuit Court (9th Circuit) - 1877 - 740 str.
...Court refers to this case, and after giving a brief summary of the positions we have stated, says: "We may therefore, assume, as the settled doctrine...face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in a court of... | |
 | Robert Stewart Morrison - 1887 - 780 str.
...Winn, reported in llth Wheaton, this case is cited, and after stating what it decided, the court said : "We may, therefore, assume as the settled doctrine...face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it could be impeached collaterally in a court... | |
 | 1887 - 892 str.
...its own statutes. In Patterson v. Winn, 11 Wheat. 380, the supreme court of the United States said: " We may therefore assume, as the settled doctrine of...face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the state had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in a court of... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1889 - 1110 str.
...— 59 Opinion. violation of law, and is absolutely void as to the 6,250 acres of new territory. " If a patent is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may be impeached collaterally in a court of... | |
 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1899 - 792 str.
...examinable at law. And in Patterson r. Wiun (11 Wheat., 380) the court speaking on the same subject said : We may therefore assume, as the settled doctrine of this court, that if a patent is absolutely void upou its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or waa prohibited by statute, or the State... | |
| |
We may, therefore, assume as the settled doctrine of this Court, that if a patent is absolutely void upon its face, or the issuing thereof was without authority, or was prohibited by statute, or the State had no title, it may be impeached collaterally... 
