United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Svazek 317United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1943 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 49
... payment of a federal tax , is not the three - year period applicable generally to criminal offenses , but the six - year period specifically prescribed by § 3748 ( a ) of the Internal Revenue Code . P. 54 . 3. A contention of the ...
... payment of a federal tax , is not the three - year period applicable generally to criminal offenses , but the six - year period specifically prescribed by § 3748 ( a ) of the Internal Revenue Code . P. 54 . 3. A contention of the ...
Strana 50
... payment of a federal tax . Petitioners were indicted , with others , on seven counts , each charging a conspiracy to violate a separate and dis- tinct internal revenue law of the United States . On the trial there was evidence from ...
... payment of a federal tax . Petitioners were indicted , with others , on seven counts , each charging a conspiracy to violate a separate and dis- tinct internal revenue law of the United States . On the trial there was evidence from ...
Strana 55
... payment thereof , " and by the addition of a new paragraph , reading as follows : " For offenses arising under section 37 of the Criminal Code , where the object of the conspiracy is to attempt in any manner to evade or defeat any tax ...
... payment thereof , " and by the addition of a new paragraph , reading as follows : " For offenses arising under section 37 of the Criminal Code , where the object of the conspiracy is to attempt in any manner to evade or defeat any tax ...
Strana 58
... payment was under protest . Thereafter respondent brought this action for its addi- tional costs cver the price of 14.43 ¢ paid it for the extra work , and was awarded a recovery by the court below . The Government's defense was that ...
... payment was under protest . Thereafter respondent brought this action for its addi- tional costs cver the price of 14.43 ¢ paid it for the extra work , and was awarded a recovery by the court below . The Government's defense was that ...
Strana 60
... payment of any cost greater than that specified by the change order . All three judges who were in the majority below agreed , as an alternative ground of decision , that if what the con- tracting officer did constituted his notion of ...
... payment of any cost greater than that specified by the change order . All three judges who were in the majority below agreed , as an alternative ground of decision , that if what the con- tracting officer did constituted his notion of ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
317 U.S. Decisions action affirmed Agricultural alleged amended amicus curiae application Assistant Attorney Attorney General Clark authority Brandeis charged Circuit Court Circuit denied claim clause Comm'n Cong Congress Constitution contract Corp Court of Appeals criminal Decisions Denying Certiorari dissenting District Court domicile employees enemy ex rel federal Fifth Amendment Fifth Circuit forma pauperis forma pauperis granted Government Group Health habeas corpus Helvering income indictment interest INTERNAL REVENUE interstate commerce January 18 judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE Labor law of war leave to proceed lien marketing ment Messrs military commission Motion for leave Nevada November 9 October 12 offenses Ohio payment peti Petition for writ petitioner pro se proceed in forma proceedings question raisins Reported respondent Revenue Act rule Section Sewall Key Sherman Act Solicitor General Fahy Stat statute Supp supra Supreme Court tion tioner trial Trust United violation wheat writ of certiorari
Oblíbené pasáže
Strana 505 - person an order requiring such person to appear before him or representative designated by him, to produce evidence if, as, and when so ordered, and to give testimony relating to the matter under investigation or in question; and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by said court as a contempt thereof;
Strana 287 - Congress has provided that judgments "shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage' in the courts of the State from which they are taken." Chief Justice Marshall stated in Hampton v. MConnel, 3
Strana 419 - . . . no person shall be prosecuted or be subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he may testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, in any proceeding, suit, or prosecution under said Acts [the
Strana 154 - (2) may, in the discretion of the grantor or of any person not having a substantial adverse interest in the disposition of such part of the income, be distributed to the grantor; then such part of the income of the trust shall be included in computing the net income of the grantor.
Strana 87 - an employee shall be deemed to have been engaged in the production of goods if such employee was employed in producing, manufacturing, mining, handling, transporting, or in any other manner working on such goods, or in any process or occupation necessary to the production thereof, in any State.
Strana 196 - Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
Strana 255 - 905, provides that the employer's liability under it "shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability of such employer to the employee, his legal representative, husband or wife, parents, dependents, next of kin, and anyone otherwise entitled to recover damages from such employer at law or in admiralty on account of such injury or death . . .
Strana 196 - nations, is hereby declared to be illegal. . . . Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
Strana 226 - 33, requires that the applicant for a patent "shall particularly point out and distinctly claim the part, improvement, or combination which he claims as his invention or discovery." As the Court recently stated in General Electric Co. v. W'abash Corp., 304 US 364, 369:
Strana 479 - The Boiler Inspection Act (§2) provides: "It shall be unlawful for any carrier to use or permit to be used on its line any locomotive unless said locomotive, its boiler, tender, and all parts and appurtenances thereof are in proper condition and safe to operate in the