Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

been spared to make the revision complete and to make the book a thoroughly up-to-date treatise on the principles of the bankruptcy law and guide to bankruptcy practice.

With the hope that this purpose has been fairly realized, the editor submits his work to the kindly indulgence of his professional co-laborers.

ALBANY, N. Y., November 17, 1900.

JAMES W. EATON.

PREFACE

TO THE

ENLARGED EDITION.

In presenting to the profession and to the public, an enlarged edition of my work on bankruptcy, it is but proper that the character and extent of the additions be explained. In this edition the forms which appeared in the original edition have been superseded by the official forms just promulgated by the Supreme Court; and the rules and orders in bankruptcy prescribed by the same court have been inserted. Not only is the full text of these rules and forms given, but an exhaustive index of them has been made, and they have been annotated and cross-referenced as far as their nature permits. The fact that by rule XXXVII it is provided that in proceedings in equity instituted for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of the bankruptcy act, or for enforcing the rights and remedies given by it, the rules of equity practice prescribed by the U. S. Supreme Court shall be followed, has led me to insert these rules; and a detailed index accompanies them.

A list of the judges of the U. S. District Courts and of the clerks thereof, and the addresses of the clerks, has been inserted for the convenience of attorneys.

The almost universal tendency on the part of practitioners, in some cases enforced by local rulings of district courts

to withhold proceedings in bankruptcy until the promulgation of the official rules, has resulted in an almost complete absence of adjudications under the new law. Consequently the enlarged edition contains, besides the additions above mentioned, no changes in the text of the original edition except the correction of a few typographical errors, and the changing of the abstract of the exemption laws of Louisiana to correspond with a new statute of that state recently passed and to go into effect upon January first, 1899. It is believed, however, that everything affecting the law and practice of bankruptcy is embodied in the book.

[ocr errors]

now

The marked favor shown to the work, the original edition of which was exhausted on the day of issue and of which there have been already four reprints, is a matter for which the author tenders his sincerest thanks. That the book, more full and complete than ever before and embracing, in one volume, the statute itself, the official rules, forms and orders, the exemption laws of all the states, the equity rules, exhaustive comment, and full citation of all authorities now applicable, — may be of further aid to the members of the profession and may assist them in the construction and application of the law and in practice under its provisions, is the wish of

THE AUTHOR.

AUBURN, N. Y., November 29th, 1898.

PREFACE.

The Law of Bankruptcy is purely statutory both in its origin and in its development. Underneath it lies the one great fundamental principle that when a person's property is insufficient to pay in full all of his creditors, it shall be equitably divided pro rata among them; but there is probably no other principle which can be said to be fixed and permanent and fundamental. Even in England, where there has been a continuous system of bankruptcy for over three hundred years, that system has been developed rather by parliamentary legislation than by judicial decision; while in the United States so infrequent and spasmodic has been the exercise by Congress of its constitutional powers upon the subject that we can hardly claim that bankruptcy is a part of our system of jurisprudence. It has been, in the past, rather in the nature of fragmentary statutory legislation, the various enactments on the subject being separated by intervals of decades, and each presenting important features not appearing in those preceding it, and often the later acts containing provisions which evidenced a different purpose and policy than those of the earlier acts. So entirely unstable and unfixed is bankruptcy as a system of law that under the last two statutes, as will be seen by reference to the notes under section 12 of the present work, the courts have very frequently been called upon to determine what is a bankruptcy law, and what the "subject of bankruptcy" includes. The successive statutes have affected different classes of persons, have materially changed the manner of procedure, have differed radically as to the acts to be regarded as acts of bankruptcy and have at times enlarged and at other times restricted the rights of creditors, or the benefits conferred and the duties imposed upon bankrupts. Not only have there been changes, but the changes

have not always tended toward any one end or indicated any fixed purpose. Like all laws of statutory creation the development of the American bankruptcy system has not been harmonious and symmetrical.

The study of bankruptcy, then, is a matter of statutory construction. The law must be considered and applied and enforced as it appears enacted, not as general notions of equity may seem to indicate as proper. The aim of the author of this book has been to study the bankruptcy act of 1898, to analyze its provisions and terms; in fine to ascertain the expressed will and intention of Congress. Following the general principle of the law of construction that each part of a statute or document is to be construed with reference to the whole, each section has been considered in connection with all others on the same or kindred topics, and copious cross-references have been given under the various sections.

But it is not to be denied that the present bankruptcy act, though presenting many points of dissimilarity, is substantially like that passed in 1867, and also bears many resemblances to those passed in 1800 and 1841. The fact has not been overlooked that the adjudicated cases decided under those acts not only shed light on the meaning of terms and provisions of the present act, but that in very many cases they are indisputably clear authorities. In so far as these cases are applicable we have cited them, and for every legal proposition unqualifiedly stated, judicial authority is given. Many of the cases cited are now analogous rather than decisive; but it is believed they sustain the points made. The reader will, of course, bear in mind that when a case is cited upon a given point, it is by us claimed to be applicable or analogous only as to that particular point. Upon other matters, by reason of differences between the present and former acts, it may be entirely inapplicable and incorrect as an exposition of the present law. While an attempt has been made to give all applicable decisions, we have also endeavored to omit all that would mislead and confuse. To show to what extent the cases may still be considered authorities, special pains have been taken to point out the differences between the statutes, and with this aim in view under each section we give the analogous provisions in all

« PředchozíPokračovat »