 | United States. Supreme Court - 1940 - 894 str.
...be asserted by it, the complaint shall be verified by oath and shall aver (1) that the plaintiff was a shareholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains or that his share thereafter devolved on him by operation of law and (2) that the action is not a collusive one to confer... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1889 - 936 str.
...the case of Hawes vs. Oakland, supra, it is said that the bill must allege that the complainant was a shareholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains, or that his shares have devolved on him since by operation of law. And this is reiterated in Dimpfell vs. Ohio... | |
 | 1882 - 624 str.
...complainant was a shareholder at the time of the transactions of which he complains, or that his shares have devolved on him since by operation of law, and that...confer on a court of the United States jurisdiction in a case of which it could otherwise have no cognizance, should be in the bill which should be verified... | |
 | 1883 - 552 str.
...be upon a verified complaint, and such complaint must contain an allegation that the plaintiff was a share-holder at the time of the transaction of which...his share had devolved on him since by operation of the law. The complaint must also set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure... | |
 | 1883 - 548 str.
...contain an allegation that the plaintiff was a share-holder at the time of the transaction 'of which lie complains, or that his share had devolved on him since by operation of the law. The complaint must also set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure... | |
 | 1884 - 1902 str.
...with the rule. Affidavit is made that plaintiffs were shareholders at the time of the transaction, and that the suit is not a collusive one to confer...the United States jurisdiction of a case of which otherwise it would have no cognizance, which manifestly, without the affidavit, it is not; and, after... | |
 | 1906 - 1122 str.
...the transactions of which he complains in said bill, and that he still owns said stock, and that this suit Is not a collusive one to confer on a court of...the United States jurisdiction of a case of which he would not otherwise have cognizance." It is claimed that these matters so alleged in connection... | |
 | 1913 - 1050 str.
...others "founded on rights which may properly be asserted by the corporation" to contain an averment that the suit is not a collusive one to confer on a court of the United States jurisdiction of a cause of which it would not otherwise have cognizance, and other allegations, none of which are found... | |
 | 1883 - 1914 str.
...complains, or that his shares have devolved upon him since by operation of law, and that the suit was not a collusive one to confer on a court of the United States jurisdiction in a case of which it could otherwise have no cognizance, should be in the bill, which should be verified... | |
| |
... that the plaintiff was a shareholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains or that his share thereafter devolved on him by operation of law... 
