 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1868 - 636 str.
...purOpinion of the Court. chased or prior thereto. Are the answers of either one of the defendants disproved by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances ? There can be no doubt, from the testimony of HC Porter, the secretary of the mining company, that... | |
 | 1881 - 982 str.
...of complainant's testimony — Partnership. — A positive denial in the answer can only be overcome by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. When the only witness for the complainant is himself, his testimony, in order to meet the positive... | |
 | 1881 - 1014 str.
...of complainanfs testimony-—Partnership. — A positive denial in the answer can only be overcome by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. When the only witness for the complainant ia himself, his testimony, in order to'mect the positive... | |
 | District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936), Franklin Hubbell Mackey - 1883 - 654 str.
...The CHIKJ JrsricE and Justice WYI.IE sitting. 1. A positive denial in the answer can only be overcome by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. 2. When the only witness for the complainant is himself, his testimony in order to meet the positive... | |
 | Franklin Hubbell Mackey, District of Columbia. Supreme Court - 1883 - 712 str.
...The CHIIF JUSTICE and Justice WYLIE Kitting. 1 . A positive denial in the answer can only be overcome by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstauces. '2. When the only witness for the complainant is himself, his testimony in oriler to... | |
 | 1895 - 1168 str.
...charge of perjury Is specially declared by the statute, and by that statute courts are bound. That rule declares that perjury must be proven by the testimony of two witnesses, or one witness and corroborating circumstances (section 1968, Code Civ. Proc.), and this case must be... | |
 | 1888 - 940 str.
...according to the well-known rule in equity, it is to be taken as true, unless overthrown by the plaintiff by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances, and that, therefore, •without more, the bill should be dismissed, and the defendant allowed to effect... | |
 | 1904 - 1164 str.
...however, being In equity, the rule obtained that the effect of a responsive answer can be overcome only by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. On the vital question whether there had been an agreement for an additional consideration, the requirements... | |
 | 1912 - 1182 str.
...thereof by the defendant and unlawfulness of consideration, is not responsive, and does not require the testimony of two witnesses or of one witness and corroborating circumstances to avoid it; the defenses set up being matters by way of justification and avoidance, which the defendant... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1894 - 804 str.
...of the Penal Code provides that in a case like the present one, where the false pretense is oral, it must be proven by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and corroborating circumstances. Without entering into a discussion of the interesting question as to whether corroborating circumstances... | |
| |
Code, is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not longer than one year or in the state prison not longer than five years, or by fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000). 
