 | George Ticknor Curtis - 1854 - 674 str.
...which were necessary to its being issued. " It is a universal principle," says the Supreme Court, " that where power or jurisdiction is delegated to any public officer or tribunal over a subject-matter, and the exercise is confided to his or their discretion, the acts so done are binding... | |
 | 1855 - 804 str.
...authority previously given, or subsequently ratified, which is equivalent." It is a universal principle, where power or jurisdiction " is delegated to any...public officer or tribunal, over a subject matter, and the exercise is confided to his or their discretion, the acts so done are binding and valid as to the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1855 - 702 str.
...In United States v. Arredondo, 6 Pet. 729, the court say : " It is an universal principle, that when power or jurisdiction is delegated to any public officer or tribunal, over a subject-matter, and its exercise is confided to his or their discretion, the acts so done are binding... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1857 - 728 str.
...within the legitimate sphere of their duties, their appraisement is final. The general principle is, that where power or jurisdiction is delegated to any public officer or tribunal over • a subject-matter, and its exercise is confided to his or their discretion, the acts so done are binding... | |
 | Daniel Gardner - 1860 - 740 str.
...acquiesced in by its tribunals and officers, must be held valid. The court (p. 729) add, that it is a universal principle that, where power or jurisdiction...delegated to any public officer or tribunal over a subject-matter, and its exercise is confided to his or their discretion, the acts so done are binding... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1841 - 688 str.
...on the contrary, have expressed the opinion that the government must bear the consequences. 'It is a universal principle, that, where power or jurisdiction...tribunal, over a subject matter, and its exercise is confined to his, or their discretion, the acts so done, are binding and valid, as to the subject matter... | |
 | Benjamin Robbins Curtis, United States. Supreme Court - 1864 - 652 str.
...King v. Picton, late governor of Trinidad, 30 St. Tr. 869-871. United States v. Arredondo. 6 P. It is an universal principle, that, where power or jurisdiction...delegated to any public officer or tribunal over a subject-matter, and its exercise is confided to his or their discretion ; the acts so done are binding... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1909 - 1058 str.
...United States v. California, 148 US, 43, the Court says : "It is an universal principle that where a power or jurisdiction is delegated to any public officer or tribunal over the subjectmatter, and its exercise is confined to his or their discretion, the acts so done are binding... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Benjamin Robbins Curtis - 1870 - 788 str.
...prove unsatisfactory, a mode of correction is provided by the act. It ia a general principle, that when power or jurisdiction is delegated to any public officer or tribunal over a subject-matter, and its exercise is confided to bis or their discretion, the acts so done are binding... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1870 - 854 str.
...these powers involves knowledge, judgment, and discretion. We hold, as was held in that case, that when power or jurisdiction is delegated to any public officer or tribunal over a subject-matter, and its exercise is confided to his or their discretion, the acts so done are in general... | |
| |
It is a universal principle, that, where power or jurisdiction is delegated to any public officer or tribunal over a subject-matter, and its exercise is confided to his or their discretion, the acts so done are binding and valid as to the subject-matter... 
