| Great Britain. High Court of Admiralty, John Dodson - 1815 - 540 str.
...intention from the fad. It is done ly them if it is done by him, for nothing can be more certain than that the act of the agent is the act of the principal. It is a trading for which the Britiflj Orders in Council fubject the property to confifcution, and... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1891 - 700 str.
...and this evidence in no way contradicts the written agreement. It does not deny that it is binding on those whom, on its face, it purports to bind, but...binds another, by reason that the act of the agent, in signing the agreement, in pursuance of his authority, is, in law, the act of the principal. But,... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 964 str.
...It does not deny that it is binding on those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind; but shews that it also binds another, by reason that the act of the agent, in signing the agreement, in pursuance of his authority, is in law the act of the principal. But, on... | |
| Colin Blackburn Baron Blackburn - 1845 - 374 str.
...does not deny that it is binding on " those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind, but " shews that it also binds another, by reason that the " act of the agent in signing the agreement in pur" suance of his authority, is, in law, the act of the " principal. But,... | |
| Charles Greenstreet Addison - 1847 - 988 str.
...matter. (Ante, £59.) This evidence " does not deny that it is binding on those, whom on the face of it, it purports to bind ; but shows that it also binds another, by reason that the act of the agent, in signing the agreement in pursuance of his authority, is in law the act of the principal." (y) Tims,... | |
| William Paley - 1847 - 732 str.
...contradwts the written agreement. It does not deny that it is binding upon those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind ; but shows that it also binds another, by reason that the act of the agent, in signing the agreement in pursuance of his authority, is in law the act of the principal. But on... | |
| John William Smith - 1847 - 438 str.
...deny that the contract is binding on those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind, but shews that it also binds another by reason that the act of the agent in signing the agreement in pursuance of his authority is, in law, the act of the principal. Higgins... | |
| Herbert Broom - 1847 - 232 str.
...it does not deny that it is binding on those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind, but shews that it also binds another by reason that the act of the agent, in signing the agreement in pursuance of his authority, is in law the act of the principal. (*/) And... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1895 - 772 str.
...hold that this was conclusive evidence of attempted fraud, and to direct a verdict, upon the theory that the act of the agent is the act of the principal. The policy was the Michigan standard, which provides: " This entire policy shall be void if the insured... | |
| John William Smith - 1853 - 488 str.
...unknown principal, as it does not deny that the contract is binding on those whom, on the face of it, it purports to bind, but shows that it also binds another by reason that the act of the agent in signing the agreement in pursuance of his authority is, in law, the act of the principal ; Higgins... | |
| |