 | 1843 - 530 str.
...Contract for sale and future delivery of goods not then in vendor's possession, valid.) A contract for the sale of goods, to be delivered at a future day, is not invalidated by the circumstance that at the time of the contract, the vendor neither has the goods... | |
 | Royal Agricultural Society of England - 1893 - 1182 str.
...The generally accepted doctrine in this country is, as stated by Mr. Benjamin, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is valid, even though the seller has not the goods nor any other means of getting them than to go into the market... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1840 - 752 str.
...in point of space. Ward v. Byrne, 548 SALE OF GOODS. When not in Vendor's Possession. A contract for the sale of goods, to be delivered at a future day, is not invalidated by the circumstance that at the time of the contract, the vendor neither has the goods... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1842 - 814 str.
...persons who had an option either to work for this or that person as they chose. A contract (Z) for the sale of goods, to be delivered at a future day, is not invalidated by the circumstance, that, at the time of the contract, the vendor neither has the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1854 - 750 str.
...declaration, quite distinct and independent of each other: it discloses nothing illegal. A contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day, is not invalidated by the circumstance that, at the time of the contract, the vendor neither has the goods... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1857 - 614 str.
...partakes of the nature of a gambling transaction; but it is now well established, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day, is not invalidated by the circumstance that, at the time of the contract, the vendor neither has the goods... | |
 | John Scott, Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas - 1858 - 568 str.
...Hibblewaite v. M'Morine, 5 M. & W. 462, f disposes of the objection. It was there held, that a contract for the sale of goods, to be delivered at a future day, is not invalidated by the circumstance that at the time of the contract the vendor neither has the goods... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1861 - 840 str.
...persons who had an option either to work for this or that person as they chose (k). A contract for the sale of goods, to be delivered at a future day, is not invalidated by the circumstance that, at the time of the contract, the vendor neither has the goods... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1866 - 626 str.
...Stanton v. Small, 3 Sandford's NY Sup. Court R., 230, "But it is now well established that a contract for the sale of goods, to be delivered at a future day, is not invalidated by the circumstance that at the time of the contract the vendor neither has the goods... | |
| |
The generally accepted doctrine in this country is, as stated by Mr. Benjamin, that a contract for the sale of goods to be delivered at a future day is valid, even though the seller has not the goods, nor any other means of getting them than to go into... 
