 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909 - 796 str.
...owner or possessor thereof would be bound to do if in possession ;" also " that every receiver * * * may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of...previous leave of the court in which such receiver * * * Was appointed." It is not disputed but that under this Federal statute civil suits for damages... | |
 | 1888 - 564 str.
...owner would be bound to do if in possession. Section 3 allows suit to be brought against a receiver in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property in his charge, without the previous leave of the court which appointed him; such suit... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1887 - 460 str.
...owner would be bound to do if in possession. Section 3 allows suit to be brought against a receiver in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property in his charge without the previous leave of the court which appointed him ; such suit... | |
 | 1894 - 2074 str.
...— LEAVK OF COURT. Supp. Rev. St. G14, which declares that any receivers appointed by federal courts "may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his In carrying on the business" without leave of court, does not authorize a suit by a stockholder of a corporation against its receiver... | |
 | 1920 - 2100 str.
...Section 66 of the Judicial Code (section 1048, West's United States Compiled Statutes of 1916) provides as follows: "Every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any court of the United Staffs may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected... | |
 | 1894 - 2072 str.
...corrected by the act of August 13, 1888, c. 866, (25 Stat. 433.) every receiver appointed by a court of tbe United States may be sued, in respect of any act or transaction of his In carrying ou tlio business connected with the property, without the previous leave of the court by which sue!)... | |
 | 1905 - 1124 str.
...Act Aug. 13, 1888, c. 866, 25 Stat. 436 [US Comp. St. 1901, p. 582], which reads as follows: "That every receiver or manager of any property, appointed by any court of 1 in1 United States, may be sued In respect to any act or transaction of bis In carrying on tbe business... | |
 | 1901 - 958 str.
...(25 S tat. at b. 436, chap. 866), permitting receivers appointed by any court of the United States to be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his...previous leave of the court in which such receiver is appointed, was it competent for said Edward C. Baggs, as receiver of the Denver City Railroad Company,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - 1066 str.
...Cong. March 8. 1887, 5 8, (24 St. 552, ) providing that every receiver appointed by a federal court may be sued "in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business" without leave of the court appointing tiirn, applies to such a receiver in respect of an act of his... | |
 | 1894 - 1266 str.
...552,) as corrected by the act of August 13, 1SSS, c. 8G6, (25 Stat. 433,) every receiver appointed by a court of the United States may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of bis in carrying on the business connected with the property, without the previous leave of the court... | |
| |
In respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property... 
