| Indiana - 1978 - 824 str.
[ Omlouváme se, ale obsah této stránky je nepřístupný. ] | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1886 - 746 str.
...position, in reference to the rule of construction, is (1) that it is opposed to the well-recognized rule that statutes in derogation of the common law are to be construed strictly. See Sinnickson v. Johnston, ..' Harr. 144 ! Tlnsman v. Railroad Co., 2 Dutch. 167 ; Potter' x Dodd... | |
| John Bouvier - 1854 - 674 str.
...chap. 2, sec. 2. No. 90. provisions, if it is generally beneficial, may be equitably construed. (a) Statutes in derogation of the common law are to be construed strictly. (6) SECTION 2. OF THE LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION. 89. In civil cases, a liberal interpretation must be adopted... | |
| Vermont. Supreme Court - 1855 - 830 str.
...part of the crops, unless his wife join in a deed, and have the same acknowledged and recorded, &c. Statutes in derogation of the common law, are to be construed strictly, and cannot be extended further than the express wording of the statute will warrant. Paine v. Ely et... | |
| Theodore Sedgwick - 1857 - 770 str.
...contracting with and conveying lands to each other."J To understand the meaning and present value of the rule that statutes in derogation of the common law are to be strictly construed, we must keep in mind the feelings of our ancestors in regard to that system of... | |
| Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1858 - 718 str.
...afterwards from sale under execution. It has been already remarked that the defendant's counsel insists, that statutes in derogation of the common law are to be construed strictly. And yet the rule, in some of the courts, has been sometimes modified on the one hand, and on the other... | |
| New York (State). Superior Court (New York), Joseph S. Bosworth - 1859 - 756 str.
...view to substantial justice between the parties, (Code, § 159). And again it is enacted (§ 467) that the rule, that statutes in derogation of the common law, are to be strictly construed, has no application to the code. Rowland v. Phalen. tation of its words when no... | |
| |