 | Alabama. Supreme Court, George Noble Stewart - 1835 - 526 str.
...avail himself of it, if he do not, himself, use common and ordinary caution to be in the right. That one person being in fault, will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. That two things must concur, to support this action: an obstruction in the road, by the fault of the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, James Manning, Thomas Colpitts Granger - 1841 - 1114 str.
...be the wrong side of the road, that would not authorise another purposely to ride up against them. One person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action, an obstruction in the road by the fault of the defendant,... | |
 | Charles Abbott (Baron Tenterden) - 1846 - 1088 str.
...another, and avail himself of it, if he do not use common and ordinary caution to be in the right. One person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action, — a collision by the fault of the defendant, and no... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - 1886 - 990 str.
...accurate language of Lord Ellenborough, in the»case of Butterfield vs. Forrester, 11 East, p. 60, "One person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself." And in Bridge vs. Grand Junction Railway Company, 3 M. & W., 248, it is said, " The rule of law is laid... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court, Merritt M. Robinson - 1847 - 724 str.
...side of the road, that would not authorize a person purposely to ride up against them. One person's being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. — Two things must concur, to support this action — an obstruction in the road by the fault of the... | |
 | Louisiana. Supreme Court - 1849 - 814 str.
...considered the wrong side of the road, that would not authorise another purposely to ride up against them. One person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action — an obstruction on the road by the fault of the defendant,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1852 - 668 str.
...not in fault is bound to make every fair and reasonable effort, Williamson et al. v. Barrett et al. in the emergency, within his power, from due exercise...drawn, that it was the duty of the master of the Major Barbonr not only to have stopped her engines, but to have reversed them, and backed his boat, in order... | |
 | Theodore Sedgwick - 1852 - 722 str.
...if he do not himself use common and ordinary caution to be in the right ; one person's being in the fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself."* And the same principle has been recognized in various cases in England and in this country.f We shall have... | |
| |
... one person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself Two things must concur to support this action. An obstruction in the road by the fault of the defendant, and no want of ordinary care to avoid it on the part... 
