 | Stefan Timmermans, Marc Berg - 2010 - 288 str.
...decided to locate risk and responsibility. In this sense, as Leigh Star and Geof Bowker point out, "each standard and each category valorizes some point of view and silences another." 10° In the standardized thalidomide distribution system, silencing and valorizing are inevitably tied... | |
 | Peter Gronn - 2003 - 196 str.
...effect of making some dimensions visible is to create a public agenda of admissibility. Thus, 'every standard and each category valorizes some point of view and silences another' (Bowker and Star, 2000, p. 156). Three particular features of the relationship between standards of... | |
 | 2004 - 312 str.
...instrumental or aesthetic rationality. As Bowker and Star (1999, pp. 5 — 6) note, this is a dangerous thing: Each standard and each category valorizes some point...inherently a bad thing —indeed it is inescapable. But it is an ethical choice, and as such it is dangerous — not bad, but dangerous. Developing a practice... | |
 | Janet Mary Rankin, Marie Louise Campbell - 2006 - 233 str.
...classifications may indeed 'make things work like magic' (1999: 9), Bowker and Star point out that 'each standard and each category valorizes some point of view and silences another' (1999: 5). We think it is important to apply that insight to nursing and ask, When nursing is represented... | |
| |
Each standard and each category valorizes some point of view and silences another. This is not inherently a bad thing —indeed it is inescapable. 