Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Isabelle Cappello for the United States. Reported below: 221 F. 2d 959.

No. 85, Misc. Court of Illinois.

VOLA v. RAGEN, WARDEN. Supreme
Certiorari denied.

No. 87, Misc. VAN PELT V. RAGEN, WARDEN. Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 88, Misc. ROUZER v. CLAUDY, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District. Certiorari denied.

No. 90, Misc. LAVERA V. NEW JERSEY. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.

No. 92, Misc. LABOSTRIE V. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 93, Misc. PENNSYLVANIA EX REL. LANE v. Baldi, SUPERINTENDEnt, PhiladelphIA COUNTY PRISON. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District. Certiorari denied. Robert E. Redding for petitioner. Reported below: 380 Pa. 201, 110 A. 2d 409.

No. 94, Misc. MILANO v. NEW YORK. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department. Certiorari denied.

No. 95, Misc. MARKS v. RANDOLPH, WARDEN. Circuit Court of St. Clair County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 97, Misc. HOOPER V. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 98, Misc. SMITH V. SKEEN, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Certiorari denied.

October 10, 1955.

No. 103, Misc.

LAZZARA V. CALIFORNIA.

350 U.S.

District

Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 131 Cal. App. 2d 663, 281 P.2d 4.

No: 105, Misc. MATTHEWS v. DAY, WARDEN. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 381 Pa. 617, 114 A. 2d 122.

No. 108, Misc. FARRAR v. TEXAS. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied. Woodrow Seals for petitioner. Reported below: 162 Tex. Cr. R., 277 S. W. 2d 114.

No. 109, Misc. BRABSON v. NEW YORK. Court of General Sessions, New York County, New York. Certiorari denied. Petitioner pro se. Frank S. Hogan and Charles W. Manning for respondent.

No. 112, Misc. VAUGHAN v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GREENVILLE ET AL. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 218 F. 2d 804.

No. 117, Misc. EVANS v. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 118, Misc. KEITHLEY V. ILLINOIS. Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.

No. 143, Misc.

MITCHELL V. NEBRASKA. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Certiorari denied.

Rehearing Denied.

No. 340, Misc., October Term, 1954. BOZELL v. LindSAY ET AL., 348 U. S. 973. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

[blocks in formation]

No. 20, October Term, 1954. ELLIS v. DIXOn et al., MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF YONKERS, 349 U. S. 458;

No. 654, October Term, 1954. PAPALARDO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, 349 U. S. 920;

No. 694, October Term, 1954. IN RE RINES, ADMINISTRATOR, 349 U. S. 935;

No. 703, October Term, 1954. SCHWARTZ, ADMINISTRATRIX, V. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY Co., 349 U. S. 931;

No. 728, October Term, 1954. BEECHER V. LEAVENWORTH STATE BANK ET AL., 349 U. S. 945;

No. 161, Misc., October Term, 1954. BEECHER V. LEAVENWORTH State Bank ET AL., 349 U. S. 947;

No. 730, October Term, 1954. ALKER V. FIDELITYPHILADELPHIA TRUST CO., TRUSTEE, ET AL., 349 U. S. 939; No. 740, October Term, 1954. BEATY V. UNITED STATES, 349 U. S. 946;

No. 746, October Term, 1954. THYS COMPANY ET AL. v. ANGLO-CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK, EXECUTOR, 349 U. S. 946;

No. 761, October Term, 1954. Coco v. FLORIDA, 349 U.S. 931;

No. 764, October Term, 1954. HUPMAN v. UNITED STATES, 349 U. S. 953;

No. 444, Misc., October Terin, 1954. KOSTAL v. CALIFORNIA, 349 U. S. 923;

No. 464, Misc., October Term, 1954. HEIRENS v. ILLINOIS, 349 U. S. 947;

No. 611, Misc., October Term, 1954. RODRIGUEZ V. JACKSON, WARDEN, 349 U. S. 963;

No. 613, Misc., October Term, 1954. WILSON v. DisTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 349 U. S. 963; and

No. 623, Misc., October Term, 1954. HILL v. UNITED STATES, 349 U. S. 964. Petitions for rehearing denied.

[blocks in formation]

No. 626, Misc., October Term, 1954. DAVis v. SumMERFIELD, POSTMASTER GENERAL, 349 U. S. 965;

No. 628, Misc., October Term, 1954. WARDEN, 349 U. S. 965;

LENZ v. LOONEY,

No. 629, Misc., October Term, 1954. HARVEY V. MAYO, PRISON CUSTODIAN, 349 U. S. 965;

No. 635, Misc., October Term, 1954. ILLINOIS, 349 U. S. 966;

BYRNES V.

No. 649, Misc., October Term, 1954. WALlace v. CoPIAH COUNTY LUMBER CO. Et al., 349 U. S. 966;

No. 669, Misc., October Term, 1954. NEWSTEAD V. BAYNES, 349 U. S. 950; and

No. 684, Misc., October Term, 1954. HUDSON V. UNITED STATES, 349 U. S. 968. Petitions for rehearing denied.

No. 145, October Term, 1954. MARCELLO v. BONDS, OFFICER IN CHARGE, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, 349 U. S. 302; and

DICTOGRAPH PRODUCTS,

No. 714, October Term, 1954. INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 349 U. S. 940. Petitions for rehearing denied. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

No. 677, October Term, 1954. MEYER ET AL. v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL., 349 U. S. 942. Rehearing denied. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

No. 742, October Term, 1954. COMBS ET AL. V. ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY COMMISSION ET AL., 349 U. S. 942. Motion for leave to file second petition for rehearing denied.

350 U.S.

October 17, 1955.

OCTOBER 17, 1955.

Decisions Per Curiam.

No. 24. WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES. Certiorari, 348 U. S. 926, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Argued October 13, 1955. Decided October 17, 1955. Per Curiam: This case is controlled by the California doctrine of respondeat superior. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of that governing principle. Henry C. Clausen argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Morton Hollander argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Paul A. Sweeney. Reported below: 215 F. 2d 800.

No. 195. UNITED STATES V. PROVOO. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Per Curiam: The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE CLARK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Gray Thoron and Philip R. Monahan for the United States. Frederick J. Green, Jr. and Theodore C. Waters, Jr. for appellee. Reported below: 17 F. R. D. 183.

No. 265. M. & M. TRANSPORTATION Co. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Per Curiam: The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Herbert Burstein for appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Samuel R. Howell and Leo H. Pou for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and S. Harrison Kahn for the St.

« PředchozíPokračovat »