Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

ORDERS FOR OCTOBER 2, 2006, THROUGH

APRIL 16, 2007

Appeal Dismissed

No. 05-1447.

OCTOBER 2, 2006

CHRISTIAN CIVIC LEAGUE OF MAINE, INC. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ET AL. Appeal from D. C. D. C. dismissed as moot. Reported below: 433 F. Supp. 2d 81.

Certiorari Granted-Vacated and Remanded

No. 05-1051. BUSSELL v. MOTOROLA, INC., ET AL. C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 141 Fed. Appx. 819; and

No. 06-81. JAMES v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY. C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 159 Fed. Appx. 686. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Burlington N. & S. F. R. Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006).

No. 05-1401. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TCHOUKHROVA ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Gonzales v. Thomas, 547 U. S. 183 (2006) (per curiam). Reported below: 404 F. 3d 1181.

No. 05-1435. TEXAS v. MASON. Ct. App. Tex., 5th Dist. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Davis v. Washington, 547 U. S. 813 (2006). Reported below: 173 S. W. 3d 105.

No. 05-10347. CROSS v. KENTUCKY. Ct. App. Ky. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Davis v. Washington, 547 U. S. 813 (2006).

Certiorari Dismissed

No. 05-10852. JONES v. SOUTH CAROLINA. Sup. Ct. S. C. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis de

October 2, 2006

549 U.S. nied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 348 S. C. 13, 558 S. E. 2d 517.

No. 05-10924. IN SOO CHUN v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SEATTLE. Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.

No. 05-10999. JONES v. SOUTH CAROLINA. Sup. Ct. S. C. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.

No. 05-11198. ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.

No. 05-11353. WILLIAMS v. NIX HOLTSFORD GILLILAND HIGGINS & HITSON, P. C. C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.

No. 05-11372. ANDREWS v. MCINTYRE. C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. Reported below: 162 Fed. Appx. 766.

No. 05-11572. KRONCKE v. ARIZONA ET AL. C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. Reported below: 171 Fed. Appx. 544.

No. 06-5013. BARBER V. PETTIFORD, WARDEN. C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. Reported below: 182 Fed. Appx. 252.

[blocks in formation]

No. 06-5037. MURPHY v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.

No. 06-5057. ATAMIAN v. NGUYEN. Sup. Ct. Del. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. Reported below: 897 A. 2d 767.

No. 06-5195. COLIDA v. KYOCERA WIRELESS CO. C. A. Fed. Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 179 Fed. Appx. 53.

No. 06-5651. GANT v. NICHOLSON, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ET AL. C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 180 Fed. Appx. 489.

No. 06-5673. WEBB v. UNITED STATES. C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.

No. 06-5817. JONES v. SALEEBY ET AL. C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule

[blocks in formation]

38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Miscellaneous Orders

No. 06A12. HUBER-HAPPY v. HAPPY. C. A. 2d Cir. Application to recall and stay mandate, addressed to JUSTICE STEVENS and referred to the Court, denied.

No. 06A100. SWEATMON v. WELLS FARGO BANK ET AL. C. A. 4th Cir. Application for injunctive relief, addressed to JUSTICE THOMAS and referred to the Court, denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

No. 06A101. SWEATMON v. WELLS FARGO BANK ET AL. C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay, addressed to JUSTICE THOMAS and referred to the Court, denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

No. 06A126. VAN STUYVESANT v. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL. C. A. 2d Cir. Application for stay, addressed to JUSTICE SCALIA and referred to the Court, denied.

No. 06A127. GORDON v. SAVITT. Sup. Ct. Fla. Application for stay, addressed to JUSTICE GINSBURG and referred to the Court, denied.

No. 06A182. ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay, addressed to JUSTICE ALITO and referred to the Court, denied.

No. D-2435. IN RE DISBARMENT OF KNICKMEIER. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 548 U. S. 930.]

No. D-2436. IN RE DISBARMENT OF TRUONG. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 548 U. S. 930.]

No. 05M92. WATERS v. MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION;

No. 05M93. POLLACK V. VIRGINIA STATE BAR;

No. 05M94. RETANA v. TIG INSURANCE CO.;

« PředchozíPokračovat »