 | United States. Supreme Court - 1824 - 990 str.
...principle seems too well established to require that more time should be devoted to it. It may, we think, be laid down as a rule which admits of no exception,...is the party named in the record. Consequently, the llth amendment, which restrains the jurisdiction granted by the constitution over suits against States,... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1835 - 624 str.
...state itself to the subject in contest was asserted. In that case the court said, " It may, we think, be laid down as a rule which admits of no exception,...on the party, it is the party named in the record." The court added, " the state, not being a party on the record, and the court having jurisdiction over... | |
 | James Kent - 1832 - 590 str.
...Supreme Court can onlytake notice of questions arising on matters of fact appearing upon the record ; and in all cases where jurisdiction depends on the party, it is the party named in the record.' (7.) The appellate jurisdiction may exist, though a state bo a party, and it extends to a final judgment... | |
 | Kentucky, Charles Slaughter Morehead, Mason Brown - 1834 - 810 str.
...itself to the nun demanded, is not within this amendment. — U. State* v. Peters, 5 Cranch, 115. 5. In all cases where jurisdiction depends on the party, it is the party named in the record. It was accordingly held, that a suit could be maintained against the auditor of the state of Ohio,... | |
 | Edward Deering Mansfield - 1834 - 284 str.
...action. 4 "As a member of a cor-poration, a government never exercises its sovereignty." § 342. It is laid down as " a rule, which admits of no exception, that in all cases under the Constitution of the United States, where jurisdiction depends upon the party, it is the party... | |
 | Edward Deering Mansfield - 1834 - 284 str.
...action. 4 "As a member of a corporation, a government never exercises its sovereignty." § 342. It is laid down as " a rule, which admits of no exception, that in all cases under the Constitution of the United States, where jurisdiction depends upon the party, it is the party... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1830 - 628 str.
...state itself to the subject in contest was asserted. In that case the court said, " It may, we think, be laid down as a rule which admits of no exception,...on the party, it is the party named in the record." The court added, " the state, not being a party on the record, and the court having jurisdiction over... | |
 | Joseph Story - 1840 - 394 str.
...extending the jurisdiction to cases arising under the laws of the United States. § 341. It may, then, be laid down, as a rule, which admits of no exception, that, in all cases under the Constitution of the United States, where jurisdiction depends upon the party, it is the party... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1844 - 800 str.
...where jurisdiction depends on the party, it is the party named in the record. Consequently, the 11th amendment, which restrains the jurisdiction granted...suits against states, is of necessity limited to those suiv in which a state is a party on the record." This reasoning of the late chief justice seems to... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1845 - 852 str.
...the language of the Supreme Court of the United States— " It may be laid down as a rule, we think, which admits of no exception, that in all cases where jurisdiction depends on the party, it u the party named on the record/' Governor of Georgia v. Madrays, 1 Peters, 122. "Jurisdiction is neither... | |
| |
It may, we think, be laid down as a rule which admits of no exception, that, in all cases where jurisdiction depends on the party, it is the party named in the record. 
