Bortel agt. Ostrander. return the overplus, as to pay the debt or damages and costs. (Subdivision 12 of 8 64 of the Code; 2 R. S. 4th ed. p. 448, § 131; 2 id. p. 447, § 127; 2 id. p. 449, § 142.) 5. A party cannot compel an officer to return an execution until after the expiration of the return day of the process. (Morange agt. Edwards, 1 Smith N. Y. C. P. Rep; Wilson agt. Wright, 9 How. Pr. Rep. 460; see rule 6 of Supreme Court Rules.) 6. The execution is regular upon its face; (Bander agt. Burley, 15 Barb. S. C. R. 404; Price agt. Shipps, 16 id. 585;) but no objection was made to the validity of the execution, or any proceeding of the constable, up to and including the sale. The plaintiff expressly sanctions the proceedings, by bringing this action for the overplus. II. In order to maintain an action for overplus moneys in the hands of a constable, arising from a sale of property by virtue of an execution, it is necessary to make a demand upon the officer for its payment, before suit. 1. A person to be eligible to the office of constable, must be an elector of the town for which he is chosen. (1 R. S. 4th ed. p. 654, § 31.) 2. An elector must be a resident of the district or town in which he votes. (Article 2, § 1 Constitution of 1846.) By the court-GOULD, Justice. All the facts in this case are admitted, and are as follows: On the 17th of December, 1855, the defendant (a constable) received an execution from a justice of the peace, against the property of the present plaintiff; which execution was returnable in sixty days, (February 13th, 1856.) On the 21st of December, 1855, the constable under said execution made a levy on two cows; on the 29th of December, 1855, he sold one cow, for a sum which exceeded the execution and his fees, by $10.57. At some time prior to the day of trial of this suit, the constable paid to the plaintiff in that execution, the amount due to him. On the 4th day of January, 1856, this present plaintiff commenced against the constable this suit, for the $10.57 surplus moneys, on the sale Bortel agt Ostrander. of the cow. The justice gave judgment for the defendant; which judgment the county court affirmed, (on appeal, by plaintiff,) on the ground that the action was prematurely brought, as the return day of the execution had not arrived, nor had the plaintiff made any demand of the surplus moneys. From that judgment of the county court the plaintiff appeals to this court. The cases cited by plaintiff, are all instances where sheriffs having executions of courts of record, had allowed the return day to pass, and had neither paid the moneys into court, (as in such courts they may,) nor paid them to the party whose they were. There indeed, there can be no doubt that a demand was not necessary before suit, as the officer by doing his duty and paying the money into court, could have discharged himself from all liability. But here the case is entirely different. The justice could not receive this money: nor could any one but the plaintiff. When was the constable, (where no demand was made on him,) bound to pay it? By 2 Revised Statutes, (4th ed.,) p. 448, § 131, he must return the execution, pay debt, &c., to justice, "returning the overplus," to the defendant in the execution. This "returning," does not precede the return of the execution, but follows it; and for the return of the execution he has till the return day; until which day, even though he has collected the money, he is not obliged to make his return. To be sure, in this case, he actually was very prompt in doing his duty, and did have the execution satisfied before this trial. Though it does not appear any where in the case, that the execution was actually returned be fore the trial of this cause. I can see no possible ground of accusing the officer of any actual neglect of duty; and I fully concur with both county court and justice, in saying that, where the return day was not past, and no demand of the surplus moneys had been made, the plaintiff's action was prematurely brought. County court judgment affirmed. NOTE.-In the case of Vence agt. Vence, ante, page 497, the order was appealed from, and the appeal argued at the May general term, 1858, at Elmira, before Justices GRAY, MASON, BALCOM and CAMPBELL, and the order affirmed. INDEX. ACTION. On negotiable promissory note, allegation of bona fide holder and owner, sufficient... The court acquires jurisdiction of an action from the time the sum- PAGE 1 8 17 128 An action on the custom against an innkeeper for the loss of the bag- 210 Misjoinder of actions. One for cause of action in tort, the other on 227 Where cross actions were brought, and the court refused before issue 236 An action against a sheriff for not returning an execution, is not one 281 Facts constituting assault and battery, and allegations constituting 314 ..... 372 Index. PAGE ...... 417 417 ACTION. It seems, that the former judgment creditor's suit to compel the dis- ture AFFIDAVIT OF MERITS. An agent or attorney in fact, may under AMENDMENT. An answer containing mere negative averments, deny- ...... Where a complaint upon a promissory note of a married woman, de- ANSWER. Answers and defences, which do not set up new matter; but 572 199 345 399 555 186 Where the averments of the complaint are absolute and unequivocal, Index. PAGE mits a part to be just, is an extraordinary and severe remedy. It should only be granted in a case clearly within its terms.... 258 ANSWER. An answer which denied that the plaintiffs were the owners and holders of the draft, held frivolous..... The court has no power to strike out pleas simply as false. The pro- ...... An answer containing mere negative averments, denying the allega- When an answer contains a mere denial of the allegations of the 266 329 345 371 420 APPEAL. Mode of reviewing justices' judgments by appeal. What the notice of appeal must contain, &c....... 32 ment. An order for a reference and to take an account, and decisions there- 57 Where on appeal an undertaking has been given, fully complying with 310 407 It is one thing to hold that a judgment can be appealed from, and APPEARANCE. Serving notice of a motion in an action on the plaintiff's A attorney, signed by an attorney as "att'y for def't," is a sufficient notice of appearance by the defendant.. Like notice of assessment of damages by a jury, on a writ of inquiry is necessary, as is required on an assessment by the clerk, where the defendant has appeared in the action..... 92 92 |