 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1913 - 996 str.
...marks the distinction between a vested and contingent interest." Kent's Commentaries, vol. 4, p. 206. The present capacity of taking effect in possession,...Chitty's Blackstone, vol. 2, page 169, note 10; Walter v. Criitcher, 15 BM, 10. In the case under consideration the persons who were to take in remainder, the... | |
 | Sir Edward Coke, Sir Thomas Littleton, John Henry Thomas - 1818 - 752 str.
...liable ; as the remainder-man may die, or die without issue, before the death of the tenant for life. The present capacity of taking effect in possession,...distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent. Foam. Cont. Kem. 329. Prest. Est. 32. 33. — [Ed.] (E) So whore a devise was to G. l ,., the testator's... | |
 | Richard Preston - 1820 - 554 str.
...particular estate, whatever may be the nature of the event on which that estate is to determine. It is the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were fallen, which invariably distinguishes a vested remainder from a remainder which is contingent (n)... | |
 | Sir Edward Coke - 1826 - 734 str.
...death of the tenant in tail ; the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possessions were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become laçant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested "•maiuder... | |
 | William Blackstone - 1827 - 916 str.
...or die without issue, before thi; death of the tenant for lite. The present capacity of taking oieci br-oome vacant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested... | |
 | William Floyer Cornish - 1827 - 284 str.
...effect in, not the criterion of a vested remainder, 98. examination of Mr. Fearne's position, that the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, universally distinguishes a vested remainder from one that is contingent, 101. POSSIBILITY, on which... | |
 | Sir Edward Coke, John Henry Thomas - 1827 - 884 str.
...or die without issue before the death of the tenant for life The present capacity of taking elFect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty thai the possession will become vacant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1891 - 700 str.
...future enjoyment. The law favors the vesting of remainders, and does it at the first opportunity. It is the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, that distinguishes a vested from a contingent remainder. It is the uncertainty of the right which renders... | |
 | James Kent - 1830 - 556 str.
...possession. Every remainderman may die, and without issue, before the death of the tenant for life. It is the present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become ^?acarrf7tT)at"(Trstmguishes a vested JftbJif1a^o1Tnn^eTirrcn7aTn^cp^'^\VIie n ^^_^___^_^_^^___J^j»... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1914 - 768 str.
...estate.' " 4 Com. 202. Mr. Washburne quotes the foregoing view of Chancellor Kent with approval and adds : "The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were now to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant before the estate... | |
| |
The present capacity of taking effect in possession, if the possession were to become vacant, and not the certainty that the possession will become vacant before the estate limited in remainder determines, universally distinguishes a vested remainder... 
