 | Aaron Burr - 1808 - 608 str.
...what has always been considered to be the law in England. Part of this decision is in these words : " It is not the intention of the court to say, that...this crime, who has not appeared in arms against his countrv: on the contrary, if war he actually VOL. I. 4 E levied, that is, if a body of men be actually... | |
 | David Robertson - 1808 - 618 str.
...law in England. Part of this decision is in these words : " It is not the intention of the court'to say, that no individual can be guilty of this crime, who has not appeared in arms against his countrv: on the contrary, if war be actually VOL. I. 4 E levied, that is, if a body of men be actually... | |
 | Aaron Burr - 1808 - 552 str.
...the words, derives some additional aid from the terms in which the paragraph last quoted commences: " It is not the intention of the court to say that no individual can be guilty of treason, who has not appeared in arms against his country." These words seem intended to obviate an... | |
 | 1808 - 652 str.
...to a levying of war, should be a\i assemblage in force. In a subsequent paragraph the court says " it is not the intention of the court to say that no individual can fee guilty of this crime who has not appeared in arms against his country. On the contrary if war be... | |
 | T. Carpenter - 1808 - 482 str.
...enlistment for a treasonable purpose could amount to levying war, then war had been actually levied. 6. It is not the intention of the Court to say, that no individual has been guilty of the crime who has not appeared in arms against his country. On the contrary, if... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, William Cranch - 1812 - 516 str.
...justify the opinion that they met for the purpose. terms in which the paragraph last quoted commences. " It is not the intention of the court to say that no individual can be guilty of treason who has not appeared in arms against his country." These words seem to obviate an inference... | |
 | 1827 - 518 str.
...treason, without actual presence. What says the supreme court, in the case of Bollman and Swartwout ? " It is not the intention of the court to say, that...war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be assembled, for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part,... | |
 | 1827 - 536 str.
...arms against his country; on the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be assembled, for the purpose of effecting by force a...treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy,... | |
 | 1829 - 524 str.
...treason, without actual presence. What says the supreme court, in the case of Bollman and Swartwout? " It is not the intention of the court to say, that...can be guilty of this crime, who has not appeared in arm? against his country ; on the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be... | |
 | William Alexander Duer - 1833 - 264 str.
...a treasonable purpose ; but • the mere enlistment of men for' such a purpose, is not sufficient. a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable design, all those who perform any part in the conspiracy, however minute, or however remote they may... | |
| |
It is not the intention of the court to say that no individual can be guilty of this crime who has not appeared in arms against his country. On the contrary, if war be actually levied — that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose... 
