Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 33The Board, 1981 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 15
... posture for decision . Appellant alleged that he sustained permanent impairment of his legs and left arm as a result of his employment - related back conditions . The Office had denied the claim upon a finding that the evidence did not ...
... posture for decision . Appellant alleged that he sustained permanent impairment of his legs and left arm as a result of his employment - related back conditions . The Office had denied the claim upon a finding that the evidence did not ...
Strana 18
... posture for decision . The schedule award provisions of the Federal Employees ' Compensation Act include legs and arms among the specified members of the body for which an award is payable , and appellant alleged that he sustained ...
... posture for decision . The schedule award provisions of the Federal Employees ' Compensation Act include legs and arms among the specified members of the body for which an award is payable , and appellant alleged that he sustained ...
Strana 19
... posture for decision concerning appellant's loss of wage earning capacity as the Office failed to properly determine that appellant could perform the duties of the selected position of watchman . Appellant , a painter , sustained ...
... posture for decision concerning appellant's loss of wage earning capacity as the Office failed to properly determine that appellant could perform the duties of the selected position of watchman . Appellant , a painter , sustained ...
Strana 20
... decision dated April 9 , 1981 , the hearing representative affirmed the Office's decision . The Board finds the case is not in posture for decision , as the Office failed to properly determine that appellant could perform the duties of ...
... decision dated April 9 , 1981 , the hearing representative affirmed the Office's decision . The Board finds the case is not in posture for decision , as the Office failed to properly determine that appellant could perform the duties of ...
Strana 23
... posture for decision . In a case involving a claim for an occupational disease , the time limitation begins to run on that date when the injured employee becomes aware , or reasonably should have been aware , of a possible relationship ...
... posture for decision . In a case involving a claim for an occupational disease , the time limitation begins to run on that date when the injured employee becomes aware , or reasonably should have been aware , of a possible relationship ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted additional aggravation alleged appellant appellant's appellant's claim August basis Board finds Board-certified burden capacity causally related caused claim Compensation Programs concluded condition continued dated December decision Department determined diagnosed disability disease Docket doctor duty ECAB effective emotional employee employing establishment employment employment injury entitled evaluation examination exposure fact factors failed February Federal filed function further hearing loss hospital impairment incident indicated injury issue January July June knee letter limitations lung March Matter medical evidence myocardial infarction normal noted November October Office medical adviser Office of Workers Office's opinion pain patient percent performed period permanent physical physician position present prior problem pulmonary reason received record relationship remanded report dated representative requested result reviewed schedule award September Service showed specialist statement stress submitted subsequent sustained terminated tests tion treatment weight x-rays