SECTION 741. Powers separated in the Federal Government... 742. Separation not complete.. 743. The general principle stated. 744. Distinction between legislative and judicial acts. PAGE. 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1267 1268 1270 749. Pardoning power of the President and contempts.. 1270 1272 751. The performance of administrative acts by the courts.. 1274 1276 1277 CHAPTER LXIV. CONCLUSIVENESS OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATIONS. SECTION 754. Due process of law does not demand determination of 762. Mandamus may not be used in place of an appeal.............. 766. Head of executive department acting for the President: when amenable to writ........... 1304 767. Obligation of the President to enforce laws believed by him to be unconstitutional....... 1306 768. Liability of the State for acts of its officers. 1309 769. Legal liability of public cfficials to private individuals 1310 770. Mandamus to compel performance of commands by ad- 771. Responsibility of officers for improper exercise of author- 1312 772. Responsibility of judges of courts of superior and general jurisdiction. 1315 CHAPTER LXV. THE DELEGATION OF LEGISLATIVE POWER. SECTION 773. Delegated power may not be delegated.... 774. Local governing powers may not be delegated.. 775. Power to issue administrative ordinances may be delegated. PAGE. 1317 1317 1318 1319 777. Other illustrative cases 1321 778. Delegation of rate-making powers... 1323 779. The referendum as a delegation of legislative power. 1324 1325 781. Penal ordinances 1327 TABLE OF CASES. A. PAGE. Ableman v. Booth, 21 How. 506; 16 L. ed. 169......S4, 123, 130, 141, 1200 Adair v. United States, 208 U. S. 161; 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 277; 52 L. ed. 436... .743, 747 Adams v. New York, 192 U. S. 585; 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 372; 48 L. ed. 575 .....828, 860 Adams Express Co. v. Iowa, 196 U. S. 147; 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 185; 49 ..... ....686, 708 Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State Auditor, 165 U. S. 194; 17 Sup. Ct. ...718, 950, 951 Rep. 305; 41 L. ed. 683..... .952, 967 .630, 755 Ah Chong, In re, 6 Sawyer, 451. 502 1043 Alabama v. Burr, 115 U. S. 413; 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 81; 29 L. ed. 435.... 1056 Allen v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 114 U. S. 311; 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 925; 29 L. ed. 200 35 .1081, 1083, 1092 Allen v. Riley, 203 U. S. 347; 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 95; 51 L. ed. 216....100, 793 Allegeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U. S. 578; 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 427; 41 L. ed. 832 Almy v. California, 24 How. 169; 16 L. ed. 644.. Ambrosini v. United States, 187 U. S. 1; 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1; 47 L. ed. 49 ... American Insurance Co. v. Canter, 1 Pet. 511; 7 L. ed. 242....273, 335, American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty, 187 U. S. 94; 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 33; 47 L. ed. 90.... .1285, 1296 American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, 192 U. S. 500; 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 365; 48 L. ed. 538... 713 American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89; 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 43; 45 L. ed. 102.... 596 Ames v. Kansas, 111 U. S. 449; 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 437; 28 L. ed. 482.. Anderson v. United States, 171 U. S. 604; 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 50; 43 L. Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S. 14; 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 237; 47 L. ed. 366 Sup. Ct. Rep. 92; 48 L. ed. 225.... Anthony v. Holderman, 7 Kans. 50... PAGE. 755 206 862 203 .259, 260 Antoni v. Greenhow, 107 U. S. 769; 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 91; 27 L. ed. 468 .1082, 1084 Appleyard v. Massachusetts, 203 U. S. 222; 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 122; 51 L. ed. 161..... 233 Arbegust v. Louisville, 2 Bush, 271. 597 Arlington Case, The, 106 U. S. 196; 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 240; 27 L. ed. 171. 1080 Armtage v. Attorney-General, 22 T. L. R. 306.... 206 Arnson v. Murphy, 109 U. S. 238; 3 Sup. Ct. Rep. 184; 27 L. ed. 920.. 623 Arthur v. Oakes, 63 Fed. Rep. 310...... 855 Asbell v. Kansas, 209 U. S. 251; 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 485; 52 L. ed. 778.. Atherton v. Atherton, 181 U. S. 155; 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 544; 45 L. ed. ..205, 207 1323 Atlantic & Pacific Tel. Co. v. Philadelphia, 190 U. S. 160; 23 Sup. Ct. 725 Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co. v. Wharton, 207 U. S. 328; 28 Sup. Ct. Auffmordt v. Hedden, 137 U. S. 310; 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 103; 34 L. ed. 674... 668 623 Austin v. Tennessee, 179 U. S. 343; 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 132; 45 L. ed. 224 647 Ayers, In re, 123 U. S. 443; 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 164; 31 L. ed. 216....977, 1079 B. 1082, 1090 B. & O. R. R. Co. v. Baugh, 149 U. S. 368; 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 914; 37 L. ed. 772 1023 B. & S. R. R. v. Nesbit, 10 How. 395; 13 L. ed. 469. 891 Bacon v. Hooker, 177 Mass. 333.. 965 Bacon v. Howard, 20 How. 22; 15 L. ed. 811.. 199 Bacon v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207; 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1023; 41 L. ed. 132.. 916 Bain's Case, 121 U. S. 1; 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 781; 30 L. ed. 849... 977 Baiz, Ex parte, 135 U. S. 403; 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 854; 34 L. ed. 222....1007 Baker v. Grice, 169 U. S. 284; 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 323; 42 L. ed. 748. PAGE. Bank of Commerce v. Commissioners, 2 Black, 620; 17 L. ed. 451..104, 105 Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee, 161 U. S. 134; 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 456; 40 L. ed. 645 ...... 906 Bank of Kentucky v. Adams Express Co., 93 U. S. 174; 23 L. ed. 872.. 727 107 Bank of Kentucky v. Wister, 2 Pet. 318; 7 L. ed. 437.. 1073 .104, 105 Bank of the United States v. The Planters' Bank of Georgia, 9 Wh. 904; 6 L. ed. 244.. ..880, 1073 Bank of United States v. Deveaux, 5 Cr. 61; 3 L. ed. 38.. 985 985 104 882 888 Barney v. Baltimore City, 6 Wall. 280; 18 L. ed. 825.. Bates & Guild Co. v. Payne, 194 U. S. 106; 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 595; 48 ...1284, 1299 Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548; 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 966; 42 L. ed. 270... Beard v. Federy, 3 Wall, 478; 18 L. ed. 88. Rep. 533; 33 L. ed. 892... 206 .595, 625, 888 369 Benner v. Porter, 9 How. 235; 13 L. ed. 119.. 845. 868 Bertram v. Robertson, 122 U. S. 116; 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1115; 30 L. ed. 1118 492 Billings v. Illinois, 188 U. S. 97; 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 272; 47 L. ed. 400.. 600 599 Blackstone v. Miller, 188 U. S. 189; 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 277; 47 L. ed. 439..... Bins v. United States, 194 U. S. 486; 24 Sup Ct. Rep. 816; 48 L. ed. 1087 Blake v. McClung, 172 U. S. 239; 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 165; 43 L. ed. 432 215, 219 Blake v. McClung, 176 U. S. 64; 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 307; 44 L. ed. 371.. iii |