 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1922 - 818 str.
...to justify such a finding." 1922] FORTIN v. BEAVER COAL Co. 511 It cannot be said that the accident had its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have happened as a consequence thereof. The mining company could not, under the law, have employed the deceased... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1918 - 720 str.
...the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood....incidental to the character of the business and not imlepend- . ent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | 1915 - 1228 str.
...the workman would have been equally exposed, apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood....the relation of master and servant. It need not have hoen foreseen or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected... | |
 | 1917 - 1226 str.
...the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood....its origin in a risk connected with the employment, ¡ind to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence." In re McNichols, 215 Mass. 408, 102... | |
 | 1920 - 1156 str.
...th« workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative Jauger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood....be incidental to the character of the business and cot independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | 1918 - 1212 str.
...497, 102 NE 697, LR A. 1910A, 30G; Bryant v. Fissell, 84 NJ Law, 72, 86 Atl. 458. "It [the accident] need not have been foreseen or expected, but after the event it must nppar to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have (lowed from that source... | |
 | 1920 - 960 str.
...the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work, and not common to the neighborhood....It need not have been foreseen or expected ; but, afU-r the event, it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and... | |
 | 1916 - 1132 str.
...the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work, and not common to the neighborhood....expected, but after the event it must appear to have li:id its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have Sowed from that source as a rational... | |
 | 1921 - 956 str.
...Co., 90 Conn. 309, 97 Atl. 320, LRA 1916E, 584. As Chief Justice Rugg has said, the causative danger must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have flowed from that as a rational consequence. McNicol's Case, 215 Mass. 497, 102 NE 697, I/. RA 1916A, 306. We are unable... | |
 | 1918 - 1348 str.
...business. Pursuing the same subject In the McNicol Case, supra, the court said: "It [the accident] need not have been foreseen or expected, but after...the event it must appear to have had its origin in the risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence."... | |
| |
It need not have been foreseen or or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence. 
