The Southwestern Reporter, Svazek 222West Publishing Company, 1920 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 3
... facts , to wit : " On the next day after said accident plaintiff sent for Mr. Z. K. Griffin , who was at that time one of the commissioners of the city of Jackson , and informed him of all the facts con- nected with said accident and ...
... facts , to wit : " On the next day after said accident plaintiff sent for Mr. Z. K. Griffin , who was at that time one of the commissioners of the city of Jackson , and informed him of all the facts con- nected with said accident and ...
Strana 5
... facts in the case the version of the plaintiff as to contro- verted questions of fact . 3. Negligence 136 ( 25 ) -Proximate cause for jury , unless undisputed facts are susceptible of but one inference . Where the facts are controverted ...
... facts in the case the version of the plaintiff as to contro- verted questions of fact . 3. Negligence 136 ( 25 ) -Proximate cause for jury , unless undisputed facts are susceptible of but one inference . Where the facts are controverted ...
Strana 7
... facts . But whether the question is one to be determined by the jury depends on the facts of each case . Thus where the facts of the particular case are controverted , and are of such a charac- ter that different minds might reasonably ...
... facts . But whether the question is one to be determined by the jury depends on the facts of each case . Thus where the facts of the particular case are controverted , and are of such a charac- ter that different minds might reasonably ...
Strana 44
... facts , what was declared as the law on the former appeal must control now un- der the familiar doctrine of the law of the case . Hartford Fire Ins . Co. v . Enoch , 79 Ark . 475 , 96 S. W. 393 ; Morgan Engineer- ing Co. v . Cache River ...
... facts , what was declared as the law on the former appeal must control now un- der the familiar doctrine of the law of the case . Hartford Fire Ins . Co. v . Enoch , 79 Ark . 475 , 96 S. W. 393 ; Morgan Engineer- ing Co. v . Cache River ...
Strana 60
... facts which the in- ferior tribunal is competent to inquire into and " If the existence or nonexistence of jurisdic- determine , a prohibition will not be granted ; though the superior court may be of opinion that the questions of fact ...
... facts which the in- ferior tribunal is competent to inquire into and " If the existence or nonexistence of jurisdic- determine , a prohibition will not be granted ; though the superior court may be of opinion that the questions of fact ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
acres action adverse possession affirmed alleged amount appellant appellant's appellee appellee's assignment attorney bank cause charge circuit court Civil Appeals claim Clearmont contract contributory negligence Court of Civil Criminal law damages death deceased decree deed of trust defendant defendant's dence Digests and Indexes employé endowment tax evidence executed facts favor fence fendant filed Furlow held injury instruction issue jitney Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Key-Numbered Digests land lien lumber ment Missouri mortgage negligence Newton county overruled owner paid parties payment petition plaintiff in error pleaded possession prosecution purchase question quiet title railroad remanded reversed rule statute suit Supreme Court testified testimony thereof Thompson & Scott tiff timber tion topic and KEY-NUMBER track tract trial court try title verdict wife witness writ
Oblíbené pasáže
Strana 187 - ... suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, * * * dependent upon such employee, for such, injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to -its negligence, in its cars, engines,...
Strana 7 - The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.
Strana 417 - Columbia and any of the states or territories and any foreign nation or nations shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or in case of the death of such employee to his or her personal representative...
Strana 357 - ... not less than fifty dollars and not more than five hundred dollars or be imprisoned not less than thirty days nor more than one year.
Strana 194 - The court may, by order, upon the application of either party to the action, after due notice to the other, to be given in such manner as the court shall prescribe, at any time after final judgment, annul, vary or modify such directions...
Strana 172 - When the products of the farm or the forest are collected and brought in from the surrounding country to a town or station serving as an entrepot for that particular region, whether on a river or a line of railroad, such products are not yet exports, nor are they in process of exportation, nor is exportation begun until they are committed to the common carrier for transportation out of the State to the State of their destination, or have started on their ultimate passage to that State.
Strana 7 - In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act.
Strana 160 - Any interested party who is not willing and does not consent to abide by the final ruling and decision...
Strana 228 - ... the court on motion of either party, or upon its own motion, may enter the final judgment...
Strana 23 - The bankrupt and the trustee specially appeared and petitioned for removal of the cause to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.