The Southwestern Reporter, Svazek 222West Publishing Company, 1920 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 99
Strana 34
... issue in the case was whether or not the contract was oral or writ- ten , and there was a sharp conflict in the testimony on that issue . Appellant testified positively that he did not sign the written Appeal from Circuit Court , St ...
... issue in the case was whether or not the contract was oral or writ- ten , and there was a sharp conflict in the testimony on that issue . Appellant testified positively that he did not sign the written Appeal from Circuit Court , St ...
Strana 35
... issue inadmissible . Where there was no issue , in view of an individual defendant's express admission , as to amount of consideration he was to pay for timber purchased from plaintiff by corporate defendant either through or from the ...
... issue inadmissible . Where there was no issue , in view of an individual defendant's express admission , as to amount of consideration he was to pay for timber purchased from plaintiff by corporate defendant either through or from the ...
Strana 38
... issue . [ 4 ] Moreover , the appellee alleged that the sum of $ 6,000 was to be paid for the timber . Appellant Lavender does not deny that such was the consideration , but , on the contrary , he expressly admits that " he was induced ...
... issue . [ 4 ] Moreover , the appellee alleged that the sum of $ 6,000 was to be paid for the timber . Appellant Lavender does not deny that such was the consideration , but , on the contrary , he expressly admits that " he was induced ...
Strana 43
... issue , and the only issue , between the appellant and the appellee , was submitted to the jury under correct instructions . There was evidence to sustain the verdict . Affirmed . HUGHES v . GARDNER . ( No. 20. ) ( Supreme Court of ...
... issue , and the only issue , between the appellant and the appellee , was submitted to the jury under correct instructions . There was evidence to sustain the verdict . Affirmed . HUGHES v . GARDNER . ( No. 20. ) ( Supreme Court of ...
Strana 45
... issue of coverture on the former appeal , we said : " There a substantial proof in the case tend- ing to show that ... issue of coverture the facts devel- oped at the last trial are substantially the same as they were in the first trial ...
... issue of coverture on the former appeal , we said : " There a substantial proof in the case tend- ing to show that ... issue of coverture the facts devel- oped at the last trial are substantially the same as they were in the first trial ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
acres action adverse possession affirmed alleged amount appellant appellant's appellee appellee's assignment attorney bank cause charge circuit court Civil Appeals claim Clearmont contract contributory negligence Court of Civil Criminal law damages death deceased decree deed of trust defendant defendant's dence Digests and Indexes employé endowment tax evidence executed facts favor fence fendant filed Furlow held injury instruction issue jitney Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Key-Numbered Digests land lien lumber ment Missouri mortgage negligence Newton county overruled owner paid parties payment petition plaintiff in error pleaded possession prosecution purchase question quiet title railroad remanded reversed rule statute suit Supreme Court testified testimony thereof Thompson & Scott tiff timber tion topic and KEY-NUMBER track tract trial court try title verdict wife witness writ
Oblíbené pasáže
Strana 187 - ... suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative, for the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee, * * * dependent upon such employee, for such, injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to -its negligence, in its cars, engines,...
Strana 7 - The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.
Strana 417 - Columbia and any of the states or territories and any foreign nation or nations shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or in case of the death of such employee to his or her personal representative...
Strana 357 - ... not less than fifty dollars and not more than five hundred dollars or be imprisoned not less than thirty days nor more than one year.
Strana 194 - The court may, by order, upon the application of either party to the action, after due notice to the other, to be given in such manner as the court shall prescribe, at any time after final judgment, annul, vary or modify such directions...
Strana 172 - When the products of the farm or the forest are collected and brought in from the surrounding country to a town or station serving as an entrepot for that particular region, whether on a river or a line of railroad, such products are not yet exports, nor are they in process of exportation, nor is exportation begun until they are committed to the common carrier for transportation out of the State to the State of their destination, or have started on their ultimate passage to that State.
Strana 7 - In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act.
Strana 160 - Any interested party who is not willing and does not consent to abide by the final ruling and decision...
Strana 228 - ... the court on motion of either party, or upon its own motion, may enter the final judgment...
Strana 23 - The bankrupt and the trustee specially appeared and petitioned for removal of the cause to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.