...United States v. Harris*, supra, p. 618. The Constitution requires no more than that the language convey "sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed...when measured by common understanding and practices." United States v. PetrUlo, supra, p. 8. Whether or not the "void for vagueness" doctrine is applicable...

...punished; but the Constitution does not require impossible standOpinion of the Court. 332 U. 8. ardfl. The language here challenged conveys sufficiently...reason, violates the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. This contention, raised by the motion to dismiss, and sustained by the District Court as...

...[T]he Constitution does not require impossible standards" ; all that is required is that the language "conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed...when measured by common understanding and practices " United States v. Petrillo, 332 US 1, 7-8. These words, applied according to the proper standard for...

...[T]he Constitution does not require impossible standards' ; all that is required is that the language 'conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed...when measured by common understanding and practices. . . .' United States v. Petrillo, 332 US 1, 7-8 [1947]." The words used must "give adequate warning...

...[T]he Constitution does not require impossible standards' ; all that is required is that the language 'conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed...when measured by common understanding and practices. . . .' ( •'wiled xiutc* v. Petrillo, 332 US 1, 7-8 [1947]." The words used must "give adequate warning...

...[Tlhe Constitution does not require impossible standards' ; all that is required is that the language 'conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed...when measured by common understanding and practices. . . .' United State* v. Petrillo, 332 US 1, 7-8 [1947l." The words used must "give adequate warning...

..." 'Constitution does not require impossible standards' ; all that is required is that the language 'conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed conduct when measured by common 695. See also id., at 704. Mr. Justice Frankfurter went on to say that " '[ sjf'xiiai immorality' is...

...practical or necessary in an area like salacious advertising. "All that is required is that the language 'conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed...when measured by common understanding and practices. . . ." Roth v. United State*, supra, at 491, quoting United States v. PetriUo, 332 US 1,7-8 (1947)....

...(Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States, 342 US 337, 340 ( 1952) ) ; The language [of the statute] conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed...common understanding and practices. The Constitution reand to interpret the new legislation to that model. Thus, the relatively narrow limits of seventeenth-...

...practical nor necessary in an area like salacious advertising. "All that is required is that the language 'conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed...when measured by common understanding and practices' * * * ." (Roth v. United States, supra, at 491, quoting United States v. Petrttlo, 332 US 1, 7-8, 1947.)...