 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 800 str.
...Ct. 188, LR A. 1916C, 797), where it is stated that the question is: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" The car upon which the plaintiff was employed went from one State into the other, and the plaintiff... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1919 - 806 str.
...Mich.— 2. gaged in intrastate commerce. It was said that the test was: "Was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation,...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" And that question was answered in the negative, and the State board's award was affirmed. In New York... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1921 - 688 str.
..."The true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in -interstate transportation...it as to be practically a part of it?" (Shanks v. Delaisxire, Lackaivantta and Western Railroad Co. 239 US 556.) We are supported in our conclusion in... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1919 - 716 str.
...The true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in inter-State transportation...related to it as to be practically a part of it?" — citing Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. 239 US 556The work covered in repairing... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 694 str.
...Employer's Liability act or the State Compensation act is whether at the time of his injury he was engaged in interstate transportation or in work so...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. 2. SAME — what does not bring injury within Federal Employer's Liability act. The mere expectation... | |
 | 1921 - 510 str.
..."The true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, Was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation...to it as to be practically a part of it?" Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co., 239 US 556, 36 Sup. Ct. 188, 60 L. Ed. 436, LRA 1916C,... | |
 | 1917 - 510 str.
..."The true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, Was the employe at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?"8 The work of some employes, however, has a broader connection with the entire operation of the... | |
 | 1918 - 502 str.
...connected with the business of interstate commerce as substantially to form a part or a necessary inciof the injury, engaged in interstate transportation or...work so closely related to it as to be practically part of it?"2 Most railroad tracks are used in both interstate and intrastate commerce, but when so... | |
 | 1920 - 496 str.
...test being whether at the time of the injury the employe was engaged in interstate transportation or work so closely related to It as to be practically a part thereof. — Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. Industrial Commission, 111., 1-5 N. E. 748. 21. ContractH... | |
 | 1928 - 1130 str.
..."The true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation...closely related to it as to be practically a part of it" See, also, Chicago, Burlington & QRR v. Harrington, 241 US 177, 36 S. Ct. 517, 60 L. Ed. 941. In Pedersen... | |
| |
Ed. 518] ), and that the true test of employment in such commerce in the sense intended is, was the employee at the time of the injury engaged in interstate transportation or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it. 
