Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

4.W64":676'

7?

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

SELECT COMMITTEE ON

CONSERVATION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEVENTY-NINTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

PURSUANT TO

H. Res. 75

A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON WILDLIFE CONSERVATION OF THE SEVENTY-
NINTH CONGRESS TO INVESTIGATE ALL MAT-
TERS PERTAINING TO THE REPLACE-
MENT AND CONSERVATION

OF WILDLIFE

91163

NOVEMBER 1, 1945, JUNE 10, 11, AND 12, 1946

Printed for the use of the Committee on Wildlife Resources

UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON: 1946

[blocks in formation]

CONTENTS

Page

308-322

Assistant Commissioner, testimony of...

Beard, George L., Chief, Flood Control Division, testimony of..

277-308

289,

290, 291, 295

Kinney, C. W., engineer in Office of Chief of Engineers, testimony of.. 283

National Park Service, Department of the Interior: Cahalane, Victor H.,
biologist, testimony of...

234-275

Soil Conservation Service, Department of Agriculture: Graham, Dr. Ed-
ward H., Chief, Division of Biology, testimony of...---
Letters and resolutions from-

217-234

D'Ewart, Wesley A., Member of Congress from Montana..
State game and fish departments.

123

124-130

Sportsmen's organizations and individuals

Report of the Committee on Wildlife, National Research Council.

130-132

[blocks in formation]

CONSERVATION OF WILDLIFE

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1945

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SELECT COMMITTEE ON CONSERVATION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES, Washington, D. C. The committee met at 10 a. m., in room 448, House Office Building, Representative A. Willis Robertson (chairman) presiding.

The CHAIRMAN. The committee will come to order. The first agency to be heard is the Fish and Wildlife Service. As usual the Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a written report of its activities for the past year. In going over that report it was discovered that there was no discussion in it on the subject of stream pollution. That was probably due to the fact that while the war was in progress little, if anything, could be done on that important subject. But in view of the fact that in some areas war industries have increased our pollution menace, and in other areas the war effort has led some manufacturers to believe that stream pollution has ceased to be a matter of major concern to those interested in the matter of conservation, I requested Dr. Gabrielson, when representatives of his Bureau appeared before us today, to designate someone to discuss the problem of stream pollution. As the members of this committee know we have three pending bills in Congress on the subject, and studies are now being made by a number of State fish and game departments and it is one of the livest conservations problems that we have. Therefore, Dr. Gabrielson tells me that Mr. Elmer Higgins, chief of the Division of Fishery Biology of the Fish and Wildlife Service, has come today to discuss the stream-pollution problem. As he will have to leave the city this afternoon, Dr. Gabrielson has asked me to call him as the first witness. The committee will now be glad to hear Mr. Higgins. STATEMENT OF ELMER HIGGINS, CHIEF, DIVISION OF FISHERY BIOLOGY, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Mr. HIGGINS. Mr. Chairman, I am intensely interested in the subject of clean streams, and I believe it is a postwar goal that can be realized. Despite the distractions of war and reconversion, Government agencies such as the State fish and game commissions and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service continue to receive numerous complaints that stream pollution is killing fish, reducing the food supply, ruining recreation, and causing damage and general nuisance throughout the land. These complaints arrive so frequently and

1 The report herein referred to will be found in the testimony of the Fish and Wildlife Service on June 10, 1946.

1

« PředchozíPokračovat »