 | William Coleman, New York (State). Supreme Court, George Caines - 1808 - 548 str.
...majores." The judgment of the court is, that the defendants take nothing by their motion, and that the rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, be discharged with costs. warrant the verdict of the jury. SPENCER, J. how- AUJ-. Term, ever, declared... | |
 | Thomas Erskine Baron Erskine - 1810 - 412 str.
...aside the verdict, for the misdirection of the Judge in the foregoing Charge to the Jury, and obtained a rule to show cause, why there should not be a new trial. There was no short-hand writer in Court except a gentleman employed by the Editors of the Morning Herald,... | |
 | Thomas Erskine (1st baron.) - 1810 - 420 str.
...said that they perished without resistance, when under my protection. On this motion the Court granted a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial — and cause was accordingly shown by the Counsel for the Crown on the J5th of November following;... | |
 | Thomas Starkie - 1813 - 710 str.
...me, though my title be not so good as the title of the other is." In the case of Smith v. Spooner*; where the owner of a house had prevented the plaintiff,...after a verdict for the plaintiff, refused a rule to shew cause why there should not be a new trial. Lord Ellenboroughf, CJ observing, " The circumstances... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1813 - 496 str.
...loss being proved, the jury found for the defendant. On Monday, the 8th of November, Dunning obtained a rule to show cause, why there should not be a new trial, which came on to be argued this day. The Solicitor General, and Dunning, for the plaintiff'.— Lee... | |
 | James Ridgway - 1813 - 416 str.
...that they perished without resistance, when under my protection. / On this motion the Court granted a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial—and cause was accordingly shown by the Counsel for the Crown on the 15th of November following;... | |
 | Thomas Erskine Baron Erskine - 1813 - 634 str.
...said that they perished without resistance, when under my protection. On this motion the Court granted a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial—and cause was accordingly shown by the Counsel for the Crown on the 15th of November following;... | |
 | Thomas Bayly Howell, Thomas Jones Howell - 1814 - 754 str.
...aside the verdict, for the misdirection of the Judge in the foregoingCharge to the Jury, and obtained a rule to show cause, why there should not be a new Trial. Mr. ERSKIXE'S SPF.ECU, in the Courtof King'sBench, on Monday the 8th of November 1784, on his Motion... | |
 | Thomas Burgeland Johnson - 1814 - 312 str.
...permitted to seize one another's guns, it would create a kind of border war amongst them. — And the rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial was discharged. 2 Wilson, 387. However, though there is no legal authority for seizing the gun, &c.... | |
 | 1816 - 752 str.
...aside the verdict, for the misdirection of the Judge in the foregoing Charge to the Jury, and obtained a rule to show cause, why there should not be a new Trial. Mr. ERSKIKE'S SPEECH, in the Court of King'sBench, on Monday the 8tli of November 1784, on his Motion... | |
| |
Pigott, for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new... 
