 | 1816 - 452 str.
...their own mistake, to litigate not his own rights but those of his principal. Lord ELLENBOROUGH, CJ 1 take it to be clear, that an agent who receives money...his principal, or done something equivalent to it. Here it is admitted that no money has been paid over by the defendant to his principal, nor has there... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1831 - 788 str.
...it in account is not a payment, Bnllei' v. Harrw>nt Cowp. 565, Horsefalt v. Handley, 8 Taunt. 13(i, and until there has been a change of circumstances...his principal, or done something equivalent to it, he remains liable. Cm v. Prentice, 3 M. and S. 344. So if he pays it over, after notice that the right... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1832 - 660 str.
...payment, Buller v. Hairison, Coirp. 565, Horscfall v. Handleit,8 Taunt. 136,i and until there has becn a change of* circumstances by his having paid over...his principal, or done something equivalent to it, he remains liable. Cox v. Prentice, 3 M. and S. 344. So if he pays it over, after notice that the right... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Sir Erskine Perry, Sir Henry Davison - 1839 - 770 str.
...agent; Buller v. Harrison (a), Cox v. Prentice^). In the latter case Lord Ellenborough CJ stated, " I take it to be clear that an agent who receives money...money to his principal, or done something equivalent." It was proved in the present case, that the defendants had accepted bills to the amount of IS.OOO/.,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1845 - 852 str.
...of plaintiffs to recover in this action, on notice and proof of Uiiiir title, so long as defendant stands in his original situation, and until there...circumstances, by his having paid over the money to his immediate employer, or done something equivalent to it. J . Smith, the defendant, was the agent of... | |
 | 1847 - 554 str.
...principle, that a voluntary payment is not recoverable back. In Cox vs. Prentice, 3 Maul, and Selw. 348, Lord Ellenborough says : " I take it to be clear,...his principal, or done something equivalent to it. And in Buller vs. Harrison, 2Cowp. 568, Lord Mansfield says, the law is clear, that if an agent pay... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1847 - 232 str.
...action for money had and received, at suit of the vendee, for any mistake in the price, or otherwise, so long as he stands in his original situation, and...his principal, or done something equivalent to it :(r) and although evidence is admissible on behalf of one of the contracting parties, to shew that... | |
 | John Simcoe Saunders - 1851 - 776 str.
...136; Whitchead v. Evans, 5 Marsh. 105, 115; Hurley v. Baker, 16 M. & W. 26); but, until there has hern a change of circumstances, by his having paid over the money to his principal, or doing something equivalent to it, he remains liable (Cox v. Prentice, 3 M. & S. 344 ; see Lilly v.... | |
 | Charles Manley Smith - 1852 - 638 str.
...credited him with the full sum, but which was still unsettled. And Lord Ellenborough, CJ, said, " 1 take it to be clear that an agent, who receives money...circumstances, by his having paid over the money to hi? principal, or done something equivalent to it. Here it is admitted that no money has been paid... | |
| |
I take it to be clear, that an agent who receives money for his principal, is liable, as a principal, so long as he stands in his original situation, and until there has been a change of circumstances, by his having paid over the money to his principal,... 
