Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of ArgumentationJohn Benjamins Publishing, 2010 - Počet stran: 308 In "Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse," Frans H. van Eemeren" "brings together the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by introducing the concept of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers to the arguer s continual efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being reasonable. It takes place in all stages of argumentative discourse and manifests itself simultaneously in the choices that are made from the topical potential available at a particular stage, in adaptation to audience demand, and in the use of specific presentational devices. Strategic maneuvering derails when in the specific context in which the discourse takes place a rule for critical discussion has been violated, so that a fallacy has been committed. Van Eemeren makes clear that extending the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation by taking account of strategic maneuvering leads to a richer and more precise method for analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse." |
Obsah
Preface | |
1 Analyzing argumentative discourse | |
2 Strategic maneuvering between effectiveness and reasonableness | |
3 Dialectical and rhetorical perspectives on argumentative discourse | |
4 Three inseparable aspects of strategic maneuvering | |
5 Strategic maneuvering in conventionalized communicative practices | |
6 Determining the strategic function of argumentative moves | |
7 Fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering | |
8 Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof | |
9 Strategic maneuvering in response to presumed inconsistency or fallaciousness | |
10 Setting up an agenda for further research | |
References | |
The series Argumentation in Context | |
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
acceptable According accusation achieve agree aimed analysis analytic approach argu arguer argumentative discourse argumentative moves Aristotle aspects audience authority burden of proof called certain Chapter choice claim classical clear combination commitments communicative activity types concept concerned concluding confrontation considered consists context critical discussion dealing defend definition determining developed dialectical dialogue difference of opinion distinguished Eemeren effectiveness evaluation exchange expressed fact fallacies figures formal function give Grootendorst insights instance institutional interests involved issue kind Krabbe logical means ment normative objective observes opening particular party performed perspective persuasion political position possible practice pragma-dialectical pragmatic premises presentational principle problem procedure proposition provides question reasonableness reconstruction refer regarding relevant resolving response result rhetoric rules sense Shell situation soundness specific speech acts stage standard standpoint starting points strategic maneuvering taken theoretical theory tion topical various