 | 1833 - 1308 str.
...the consequent injury to the mill — The Earl of Rutland v. Bon(13) See sc 10 Law Juiiru. KB 107. ; but it is a very different question, whether he can...its natural advantages, which is capable of being employed to profitable purposes, and generally increases the fertility of the soil even when unapplied,... | |
 | Sandford Nevile, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Sir William Montagu Manning - 1834 - 904 str.
...obstructed, such owner may recover for the consequential injury to the mill; Earl of Rutland v. Bowler (6) : but it is a very different question whether he can...is capable of being applied to profitable purposes, aud which generally increases the fertility of the soil eveu when unapplied, and deprive him of it... | |
 | Charles James Gale, Thomas Denman Whatley - 1840 - 382 str.
...obstructed, may recover for the consequential injury to the mill. The Earl of Rutland v. Bowler (a). But it is a very different question, whether he can...even when unapplied, and deprive him of it altogether l>y anticipating him in its applica*161 tion to a useful purpose. If this *be so, a considerable part... | |
 | John Smith Furlong - 1845 - 830 str.
...but it does not follow that the proprietor of land higher up a stream can take away from the owner of land below, one of its natural advantages, which is...capable of being applied to profitable purposes, and which generally increases the fertility of the soil(z), when unapplied, and deprive him of it altogether,... | |
 | Charles James Gale - 1849 - 552 str.
...obstructed, may recover for the consequential injury to the mill. The Earl of Rutland v. J3ow/er(b). But it is a very different question, whether he can...application to a useful purpose. If this be so, a consider- [ 161 ] able part of the value of an estate, which, in manufacturing districts particularly,... | |
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell - 1854 - 732 str.
...purposes, if the stream is diverted or obstructed, may recover for the consequential injury to the mill. But it is a very different question, whether he can...altogether, by anticipating him in its application to a new purpose. If this be so, a considerable part of the value of an estate, which, in manufacturing... | |
 | Sir John Budd Phear - 1859 - 140 str.
...obstructed, may recover for the consequential injury to the mill : Earl of Rutland v. Howler, Palmer, 290. But it is a very different question whether he can take away NATURAL RIGHTS OF WATER. prehended in the maxim, " Sic utere tuo ut alienum non leedas ;" by the aid... | |
 | Leonard Shelford, Great Britain - 1863 - 930 str.
...may recover for the consequential injury to the mill. ( The Earl of Rutland v. Bowler, Palmer, 290.) But it is a very different question whether he can...altogether by anticipating him in its application to an useful purpose. If this be so a considerable part of the value of an estate, which, in manufacturing... | |
 | Nevada. Supreme Court - 1872 - 542 str.
...purposes, if the stream is diverted or obstructed, may recover for the consequential injury to the mill. But it is a very different question whether he can...generally increases the fertility of the soil even where unapplied, and deprive him of it altogether by anticipating him in its application to a useful... | |
 | Nevada. Supreme Court - 1872 - 526 str.
...mill. But it is a very different question tvhether he can take away from the owner of the land beloiv one of its natural advantages, which is capable of...generally increases the fertility of the soil even where unapplied, and deprive him of it altogether by anticipating him in its application to a useful... | |
| |
But it is a very different question, whether he can take away from the owner of the land below, one of its natural advantages which is capable of being applied to profitable purposes, and generally increases the fertility of the soil, even when unapplied,... 
