 | Joel Prentiss Bishop - 1872 - 806 str.
...obligations of an oath, in a judicial proceeding; and, therefore, that the oath of the grand juror is no legal or moral impediment to his solemn examination...becomes material to the administration of justice." The State ». Broughton, 7 Ire. 96. In Mississippi, no oath of secrecy is taken by the grand jurors... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.), Rowland M. Stover - 1881 - 694 str.
...establishment of private rights" (Burnam agt. Hatfield, 5 Blackford [Ind.], 21). " The. oath of the grand juror is no legal or moral impediment to his solemn examination, under the direction of a court as to evidence before him, whenever it becomes material to the administration of justice " (State agt. Broughton,... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.), Rowland M. Stover - 1883 - 666 str.
...Blackford [Ind.], 21). The oath of the grand juror is no The People agt. Moore legal or moral infringement to his solemn examination, under the direction of a court, as to evidence before him, whenever it becomes material to the administration of justice (State agt. Broughton,... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1887 - 784 str.
...oath, in a judicial proceeding, and therefore that the oath of tho grand jurors is no moral or legal impediment to his solemn examination, under the direction...evidence before him, whenever it becomes material for the administration of justice. The judges have not considered the rule as designed for the protection... | |
 | 1902 - 1268 str.
...(for which no specific provision is found in our statutes) "is no legal or moral impediment to hia solemn examination under the direction of a court...the evidence before him whenever It becomes material In the administration of Justice." State v. Broughton, 29 NC 96, 45 Am. Dec. 507. "There is, In the... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 818 str.
...oath, in a judicial proceeding, and therefore that the oath of the grand jurors is no moral or legal impediment to his solemn examination, under the direction...evidence before him, whenever it becomes material for the administration of justice. The Judges have not considered the rule as designed for the protection... | |
| |
It seems to us that the witness has no privilege to have his testimony treated as a confidential communication, but that he ought to be considered as deposing, under all the obligations of an oath, in a judicial proceeding, and therefore that the oath... 