Trial Tactics and Experiences: Trial Episodes, Interesting Cases, Hints to Trial Lawyers, Suggestions as to Cross-examinations, with Illustrative Examples from Actual CasesHarrison Company, 1954 - Počet stran: 613 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-3 z 53
Strana 192
... employee may be at fault but if the employer was " in part " also negligent , the employee may recover . Then there are specific laws , known as the Safety Appli- ance Acts , the violation of which constitutes negligence per se ...
... employee may be at fault but if the employer was " in part " also negligent , the employee may recover . Then there are specific laws , known as the Safety Appli- ance Acts , the violation of which constitutes negligence per se ...
Strana 590
... Employee's negligence must be sole cause to exonerate railroad , 194 . Failure of appliance to function es- tablishes violation even though it functioned both before and after accident , 195 . Federal rules and law control in state ...
... Employee's negligence must be sole cause to exonerate railroad , 194 . Failure of appliance to function es- tablishes violation even though it functioned both before and after accident , 195 . Federal rules and law control in state ...
Strana 606
... Employee may recover from non- employer railroad , 210 . Employee of independent contractor has protection of the Act , 210 . Exact defect need not be proven , 195 . Function , failure of appliance to , establishes liability even though ...
... Employee may recover from non- employer railroad , 210 . Employee of independent contractor has protection of the Act , 210 . Exact defect need not be proven , 195 . Function , failure of appliance to , establishes liability even though ...
Obsah
CHAPTER | 1 |
XI | 25 |
Restraining the Impetuosity of Youth | 33 |
Autorská práva | |
Další části 64 nejsou zobrazeny.
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accident action answer appear attorney called cause charge City claim Clark considered counsel course court cross-examination damages deafness death defendant determine direct doctor duty effect employee evidence examination experience facts federal girl give given hand held hospital husband important injury interest involved judge juror jury Justice lawyer letter liability look matter mean mind Myra negligence never notes notice object opinion party person picture plaintiff practice prepared present prove question railroad reason record result rule side signature situation stand statement streptomycin suit Supp tell testified testimony thing thought tion told took tort trial United verdict vessel wife witness woman writing York