Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

REPORTS

от

CASES AT LAW AND IN CHANCERY

ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.

NORMAN L. FREEMAN,

REPORTER.

VOLUME 115.

CONTAINING CASES IN WHICH OPINIONS WERE FILED IN SEPTEMBER AND
NOVEMBER, 1885, IN JANUARY, 1886, AND SOME CASES IN WHICH
APPLICATIONS FOR REHEARING WERE DENIED AT

THE MARCH TERM, 1886.

PRINTED FOR THE REPORTER.

SPRINGFIELD:
1886.

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1886, by

NORMAN L. FREEMAN,

In the office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington.

Rec. Nov. 11, 1886

H. W. ROKKER, STEREOTYPER, PRINTER AND BINDER,

Springfield, Illinois.

DURING THE TIME OF THESE REPORTS.

JOHN H. MULKEY, CHIEF JUSTICE.

JOHN M. SCOTT,

BENJAMIN R. SHELDON,

[blocks in formation]

*Hon. SIMEON P. SHOPE was elected June 1, 1885, for the full term of

nine years, as successor to Mr. Justice TUNNICLIFF.

ADOPTED AT OTTAWA, SEPTEMBER TERM, 1886.

Rehearing-re-argument in support of the petition.

RULE 60. It is ordered that Rule 42 of this court (93 Ill.) be and the same is hereby amended so as to read as follows: "Application for a rehearing of any cause shall be made by petition to the court, signed by counsel, briefly stating the grounds for a rehearing and the authorities relied on in support thereof." In no case will a re-argument of the cause be permitted in support of such petition. Counsel can make reference to the original argument submitted, on the points upon which a rehearing is desired, but nothing further; provided, the mere citation of new authorities shall not be deemed a re-argument of the cause. Any petition for a rehearing of any cause filed in violation of this rule shall be stricken from the files, and thereafter no new petition for a rehearing in the same cause will be permitted, unless leave is granted by the court, of its own motion, to file such new petition.

« PředchozíPokračovat »