Switchman on railroad, one of whose rules declared that no buildings or materials would be allowed nearer than six feet to the track, while standing on the platform steps of a car, ready to alight, in the performance of his duties, was struck, without negligence on his part, by a switch-stand extending to within nine or ten inches of the car, in violation of the rule, and was injured; the peril arising from such switch-stand was not assumed by the employé on entering the railroad's service: Pidcock v. Union Pac. R. R. Co., S. Ct. Utah, Aug. 27, 1888. TELEGRAPH COMPANIES. Failure to transmit a cipher message renders a telegraph company liable for the damages sustained by the sender by reason of the nontransmission; although the printed contract contains stipulations limiting the company's liability for mistakes or delay in delivery and for non-delivery of unrepeated messages, and exempting it from liability for errors in transmitting cipher or obscure messages, where the contents are not communicated by the sender, and further exempting it in all cases where, as in the present case, claim is not made within sixty days after sending the message; these stipulations do not apply to a failure to transmit: Western Union Tel. Co. v. Way, S. Ct. Ala., Dec. 1887. Forged message, sent by local agent of telegraph company, who was also agent of an express company at the same place, by means of which the receiver was induced to send by express money, which was intercepted and stolen, renders the telegraph company liable for the loss McCord v. Western Union Tel. Co., S. Ct. Minn., Sept. 4, 1888. State tax upon receipts, returned and assessed in gross, is invalid only in proportion to the extent that such receipts are derived from inter-state commerce: Ratterman v. W. U. Tel. Co., S. Ct. U. S., May 14, 1888; 127 U. S. 411. TRUSTS. Loan of money to purchase land where title is taken in name of lender upon his verbal agreement to convey upon the repayment of the amount loaned, the grantee also giving a mortgage for a portion of the purchase-money and being secured for his liability thereon, creates a resulting trust of the whole property in favor of the person for whose benefit the loan is made: Thomas v. Jameson, S. Ct. Cal., Sept. 22, 1888. USURY. Attorney's fees on sums collected by suit may be made payable by the debtor, without rendering the contract usurious: Merck v. Am. Freehold Land Mortg. Co., S. Ct. Ga., Dec. 7, 1887. Commission paid to intermediary, through whom a loan is effected, where the lender neither takes nor contracts to take anything beyond lawful interest, does not render the loan usurious: Merck v. Am. Freehold Land Mortg. Co., S. Ct. Ga., Dec. 7, 1887. Holder of negotiable paper, which has been given originally for a usurious loan, must show affirmatively either that he is a bona fide purchaser before maturity without notice of the usury, or that he obtained the paper from such a bona fide purchaser: Knox v. Williams, S. Ct. Neb., Oct. 17, 1888. Interest overdue may be made to bear interest, such a contract not being usurious: Merck v. Am. Freehold Land Mortg. Co., S. Ct. Ga., Dec. 7, 1887. WILLS. Fee-simple is given to his wife by a testator, who devised to her all his real and personal estate, and charged her "with the raising and education of my children, such education to be the best her means will afford," and further provided that "if any of our children should voluntarily refuse education, they are not to receive any advantage in property in consequence of such refusal," and also that "my wife may give to any of our children, at any time, and in the form and manner she may think best, any portion of property she may think proper; provided, those to whom she had given shall be charged the full amount in the settlement of the estate:" Howze v. Barber, S. Ct. S. C., Oct. 23, 1888. Life estate is created by a devise of land which provides that the devisee is to "occupy and enjoy it during his natural life," and a further provision that he cannot alienate the land, nor in any way incumber it, and that it shall not be subject to attachment or levy, is inconsistent with such life estate and void as to judgment-creditors: Mc Cormick Harvesting-Machine Co. v. Gates, S. Ct. Iowa, Oct. 4, 1888. JAMES C. Sellers. INDEX. 2-7 ACCORD AND SATISFACTION. Binding Settlements. Payment of a bill for a reduced amount, after bona fide objections to a ADMIRALTY. See SHIPPING. ALIENS. Taxation. A law to tax aliens, as such, is void. 181, 182. ANIMALS. Contributory Negligence. In Indiana, allegation of want of, is necessary. 635, 637. May preclude recovery when acts are proved which establish knowledge Deer. Keeper liable on proof of knowledge of the animal's ferocity. 634. Keeper liable for injury to one who had seen persons playing with the Dogs. Keeping is lawful when accompanied with proper care and diligence to Keeper is not liable if the dog be improperly loosed by another person. Keeper liable if his servant improperly loose the dog. 637. Recovery may be had where a person knew the dog ought to be tied and Treading on a dog's tail accidentally, is not contributory negligence. Owner liable where a step broke and let a person down to where a savage Keeper of a vicious dog is an insurer. 637. Watch dogs are lawful, but must be confined within reasonable bounds. Knowledge of the dog's habit to bite in play is sufficient to charge the Indiscriminate killing of a domestic animal is not allowed, even though 807 ANIMALS-(continued.) Keeper liable only after notice of some vicious habit. 633, 634. Scienter, or knowledge of evil propensity must be averred and proved. Knowledge of the animal's mischievous propensity is a question for the Good character cannot be shown, when one previous vicious act is clearly Knowledge of an agent or servant is imputed to the master. 641. Fera Natura. Keeper is responsible without notice of the animal's propensities. 633, Keeper alone is prima facie liable. 635. Joint Owners. All the owners of an animal are liable for its actions. 642. Joint Trespassers. The owner of each of several trespassing animals must be sued sepa- In the absence of proof, each animal will be presumed to have done the Monkeys. Keeper liable, because of the nature of the beast. 634. Not only an individual owner, but also the custodian for the time being, Rabbits. Not presumed to be dangerous. 634. Keeper not liable, without notice, except for trespasses. 634. Statements made after the injury, and tending to show prior knowledge ARREST. See CRIMINAL LAW. Bystander. Assistance in making arrest may be required of a bystander by a lawful Responsibility for false arrest, not incurred by a bystander, when re- Warrant. Seal of the court necessary for the validity of a warrant of arrest. 328. Distribution of assets. Individual creditors are preferred in the distribution of an individual Lands. Auction sale may be held in the State of the assignor, of lands situate 61. Assignment passes lands as between the parties to the assignment. 204. Cause of Action. The complaint may even allege a cause of action ex delicto, and the evi- Writ. The seal of the Court is necessary to the validity of the writ. 327. INDEX. 809 ATTORNEY AND CLIENT. Authority to bind Client. Stipulation for a hearing, made by attorney for defendant, cannot be Fees. 62. Professional employment extends to all that is done, when retainer is on Professional employment is compensated for all the services taken to- Privilege of Counsel. Speaking defamatory words during a trial, is a qualified privilege, and BAILMENT. Liability of bailee. Deposit without reward, requires only ordinary care. 62. The bailee is not liable for a theft of money deposited with him, with the Discharge refused on failure from stock gambling. 270. Indemnity allowed to a claimant before the Commissioners of Alabama Property includes a claim which the sovereign has established against Not negotiable, when issued to order at 4 per cent. interest for six Statute of Limitations does not run against a certificate of deposit, until Deposits. Bankrupt estate funds, deposited by the clerk of the court, need not be 336. Set-off for immatured paper of an assignor for the benefit of his creditors, Ownership of the deposit cannot be disputed by the bank after crediting Statute of Limitations does not run against funds deposited in a bank, President's Authority. Compromise of a claim not within the usual authority of a bank presi- Litigation is in the charge of the president, by virtue of his authority. |