Sovereignty: Organized HypocrisyPrinceton University Press, 2. 8. 1999 - Počet stran: 280 The acceptance of human rights and minority rights, the increasing role of international financial institutions, and globalization have led many observers to question the continued viability of the sovereign state. Here a leading expert challenges this conclusion. Stephen Krasner contends that states have never been as sovereign as some have supposed. Throughout history, rulers have been motivated by a desire to stay in power, not by some abstract adherence to international principles. Organized hypocrisy--the presence of longstanding norms that are frequently violated--has been an enduring attribute of international relations. |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 32
... effective control is eroding. Some have suggested that new norms, such as universal human rights, represent a fundamental break with the past, while others see these values as merely a manifestation of the preferences of the powerful ...
... effective control within the borders of their own polity. Finally, interdependence sovereignty refers to the ability ... effectively exercised. Interdependence sovereignty is exclusively concerned with control and not authority, with the ...
... effective control exercised by those holding authority; interdependence sovereignty, referring to the ability of public authorities to control transborder movements; international legal sovereignty, referring to the mutual recognition ...
... effective, force or compulsion would never have to be exercised. Authority would be coterminous with control. But control can be achieved simply through the use of brute force with no mutual recognition of authority at all. In practice ...
... effectively is it exercised? Bodin and Hobbes, the two most important early theorists of sovereignty, were both ... effectiveness of political authorities within their own borders may. (which is called in this study international legal ...