 | Great Britain, Great Britain. Courts - 1835 - 506 str.
...circumstances, and is to be gathered from a train of conduct which the Court is to interpret as well as it can. The first general and simple rule is, if a man sees what a reasonable / •'h man could not see without alarm; if he sees what a reasonable man/tT£ could not permit, he... | |
 | Leonard Shelford - 1841 - 532 str.
...conduct and circumstances.(uI) F *453 1 ,^he ^rst 8eneral anii simple rule is, if a man sees *• -I what a "reasonable man could not see without alarm...making allowance for defective capacity; dulness of perception, or the like, which exclude intention, is not connivance ; there must be intention. The... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1845 - 750 str.
...Having adverted to the case of Timmings v. Timmingt, I now come to the case of Moorsom v. Moorsom:— The first general and simple rule is, if a man sees what a sonablc man could not see without alarm ; if he sees what a reasonable man could not permit, he must... | |
 | Great Britain. Courts - 1848 - 724 str.
...knowledge ?] Gross negligence may amount to guilty knowledge. Lord Stowell, in Moortom v. Moorsom, says: "If a man sees what a reasonable man could not see...must be supposed to see and mean the consequences." The husband in this case must have seen and meant the consequences. [LORD CAMPBELL. — Dr. Lushington... | |
 | Richard Thomas Tidswell, Sir Ralph Daniel Makinson Littler - 1860 - 376 str.
...pleasure, and gave a degree of passive concurrence to it, Walker v. Walkerf quoted 3 Hagg. 59. The general and simple rule is, if a man sees what a reasonable...is not to be too rigorously applied without making allowances for defective capacity, dulness of perception, or the like, which excluding intention, is... | |
 | William Ernst Browning - 1879 - 418 str.
...fit injuria,' he annot complain of any act he passively assented to." To take the husband's case : 7 if a man sees what a reasonable man could not see...must be supposed to see and mean the consequences; if such a state of things exists—whether brought about by the acquiescence of the husband or independently... | |
 | 1906 - 1172 str.
...effectual as an active one to bar the action. Lord Stowell, in Morson v. Morson, 3 Hagg. 87, said: "The first general and simple rule is if a man sees...must be supposed to see and mean the consequences. * * » The presumption of the law is against connivance, and, if the facts can be accounted for without... | |
 | 1906 - 1284 str.
...effectual as an active one to bar the action. Lord Stowell, in Morson v. Morson, 3 Ilagg. 87, said: "The first general and simple rule is if a man sees what a reasonable man could not see without alarin, if he sees what a reasonable man could not permit, he must be supposed to see and mean the... | |
| |
The first general and simple rule is, if a man sees what a reasonable man could not see without alarm; if he sees what a reasonable man could not permit, he must be supposed to see and mean the consequences... 