Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub

275 U.S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court.

No. 161. E. M. JONES BURGET V. THE BOROUGH OF DORMONT, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. November 28, 1927. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 11. E. M. Jones Burget, pro se. No appearance for the defendant in error.

No. 128. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. R. HUDSON BURR, A. S. WELLS, ET AL. On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida. December 1, 1927. Dismissed on motion of Messrs. T. W. Davis, James F. Wright, W. E. Kay, Thos. B. Adams and Frank W. Gwathmey for petitioner. Messrs. Fred. H. Davis and George C. Bedell for respondents.

No. 129. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY V. STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. R. HUDSON BURR, A. S. WELLS, ET AL. On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida. December 1, 1928. Dismissed on motion of Messrs. T. W. Davis, James F. Wright, W. E. Kay, Thos. B. Adams and Frank W. Gwathmey for petitioner. Messrs. Fred H. Davis and G. C. Bedell for respondents.

No, 192. GEORGE MCNEIR v. CHARLES W. ANDERSON, COLLECTOR. On writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. January 3, 1928. Reversed on confession of error, and mandate granted, on motion of Solicitor General Mitchell in that behalf. Mr. Russell L. Bradford for petitioner.

No. 505. CHICAGO CHEESE AND FARM PRODUCTS Co. v. UNITED STATES. On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims. January 3, 1928. Dismissed on mo

83583°-28 37

Cases Disposed of During Vacation.

275 U.S.

tion of Mr. Robert N. Golding, in behalf of Mr. Willis D. Nance and Mr. Joseph B. Fleming, for the petitioner. No appearance for the United States.

CASES DISPOSED OF DURING VACATION.

No. 123. UNITED STATES v. DAVID R. J. ARNOLD, ADMR. July 5, 1927. Dismissed pursuant to the 32d rule. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway and Mr. Fred K. Dyar for the United States. Mr. T. Ludlow Chrystie for respondent.

No. 118. FRANK K. BOWERS, COLLECTOR, v. WALTER E. FREW ET AL., EXECUTORS. July 13, 1927. Dismissed pursuant to the 32d rule. Solicitor General Mitchell for petitioner. Messrs. Abram J. Rose, Alfred C. Petté and Philip M. Brett for respondents.

No. 453. HENRY E. HOLMES ET AL v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. August 17, 1927. Docketed and dismissed under Rule 10 by Messrs. Carl I. Wheat and Walker H. Robinson for defendants in error. Mr. Max Thelen for plaintiffs in error.

No. 322. BRANDES PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. LEKTOPHONE CORPORATION. September 4, 1927. Dismissed pursuant to the 32d Rule. Messrs. Livingston Gifford, George F. Scull and John Boyle, Jr., for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.

APPENDIX

REVISED RULES

OF

THE SUPREME COURT

OF

THE UNITED STATES

ADOPTED JUNE 5, 1928. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1928

(The Acts of February 13, 1925, c. 229, 43 Stat. 936; January 31,

1928, c. 14, 45 Stat. 54, and April 26, 1928, c. 440, 45 Stat. 466, are printed as an appendix to the Rules.)

« PředchozíPokračovat »