JUDGES

OF THE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

OF THE

STATE OF INDIANA,

HON. JAMES S. FRAZER,*
HON. ROBERT C. GREGORY,†

HON. CHARLES A. RAY,

HON. JEHU T. ELLIOTT.

*HON. JAMES S. FRAZER was Chief Justice at November Term 1867. HON. ROBERT C. GREGORY was Chief Justice at May Term 1868.

号

For previous decisions of the Supreme Court of this State, overruled, affirmed or modified, see INDEX, tit. CASES OVERRULED, &c.

Cartright, Shirk V.....................406
Cavanaugh, Reilly v................
...435

Chapin v. Clapp .

E

.............614 Egbert, Trustee &c., et al. v.
Schultz........

Chapin v. Clapp et al.................611
Chapin v. Osborn et al ............... 99 | Eller, Farley et al. v.
Chapman, Street v....................142 Ellis, Devan v
City of Evansville, Brinkmeyer v. 187
City of Indianapolis et al., The
Indianapolis Rolling Mill Co. v.245
City of Indianapolis v. Harbison..420
City of Indianapolis v. Langsdale
et al.......
.486
City of Logansport, Musselman v.533
City of New Albany et al. v. Cook

..242

......322

72

32

95

..........

Ellison v. Wisehart et al
Erwin et al. v. Bulla..........
Evansville, City of, Brinkmeyer v.187
Evansville &c. R. R. Co., Law-
rence v.............................. ........... ............622
Ex parte, Clifford.......

F

....106

....114

Falley et al v. Giles ....611 Farley et al. v. Eller..................322 ..614 Felkner v. Scarlet......... .........154 ..555 Fifield v. The Board of Commis.106 sioners of Porter Co...............593 Fitzer v. Fitzer.......

.256

Cochran et al., Myers et al. v...
Coffroth, McElfatrick v............. 37
Colley, Schmidt v

Collins et al. v. Kemp et al........281
Conger v. Parker
Conner v. Conner.............

..................

........198

Cook et al., The City of New Al-
bany et al. v.........
Cornett, Johnson et al. v.........
Cotton, The Jeffersonville R. R.
Co. v......
Covington, Town of, Redden v.....118
Cox v. The Etna Insurance Co...586
Cox, The Indianapolis &c. R. R.
Co., v
...............360
Crane v. Buchanan et al...........570
Crary, Freese v.......

Flanders, Robinson v................ 10
Fleming v. Bumgarner et al........424
Flenner v. Flenner
Ford v. Fuget et al

120

......564

.380

52

48

Ford, v. The State, ex rel. Hilton..541
Freese v. Crary....

.524

220

59

Frost, Kyle et al., V.......................................
Fuget et al., Ford v..............

.524

Gibbs, Miller v......

228

Crigler, Smith v

..516

Cuppy v. Hixon et al......

...........522

Giles, Falley et al. v..................
Gilman et al. v. Gard....

114

.291

Davis, Thompson et al., v............264 Graham et al v. Klyla...........................

Dean v. The Board of Commission

ers of Putnam Co..................117 Dean v. The State, ex rel. Marri

Grammar et al., The State, ex rel.
Vincennes Township v..........530
Gregory v. High et al ...............527
Gregory v. Perdue ......

.483

66

Grossman v. Lauber et al..........618
Guy v. Barnes

............ ............

..103

Hart et al. v. The State, ex rel.
Baker.....

.469

.200

Kaufman v. Bott et al...............521
Kaufman et al. v. Dickensheets et

al......... ......... ......
Kaufman v. Wilson

......154 .504 ....163

1

.134

Hayden, Dunlop et al. v............303 Heavilon v. Heavilon....... .....509 Hedge et al. v. Sims et al...........574 Hedrick et al., Goodwine v. ....383 Kemp v. Mitchell et al....................................... Herrick v. Bunting ..467 Kemp v. Mitchell et al..............225 280 Kemp et al., Collins et al. v...... 281 Hetfield, Lamb, Treas. &c. v.... .527 Key et al. v. Ostrander........................................ High et al., Gregory v.......... Hines v. Aydelotte 518 Kimes, Vandoren et al v............582 Hixon et al., Cuppy v......... 522 King et al. v. Manville......... Hockett et al., The State v..........302 King, Hall et al. v...................205 Kisler v. Tinder Holler, Muckenburg v...............139 Howard v. Whitman, Receiver &c.557 Kline v. The Sinnissippi Ins. Co..293 Howorth v. Scarce........ .........278 Klingensmith et al., McCormack v.296 Huckleberry v. Riddle et al.. ..454 Klyla, Graham et al. v...............432 Hughes, Lowe et al. v..... ..399 Krauss v. Rich et al...... Hume et al. v. Dessar Kyle et al. v. Frost......... Hunter v. The State................. 80 Hutchins' Admx., Walters v........136

I

....112

L

V.........

.....270

...379

...382

26

.486

Lamb, Treas. &c., v. Hetfield......280
Lambert v. Whitelock.............
Langsdale et al., The City of In-
dianapolis
Lantz, The Michigan Southern
&c. R. R. Co. v......... ............528
Lauber et al., Grossman v. .........618
Lauferty, Schmitz v

Lawrence, The Evansville &c. R.
.622
R. Co. v...................................... .........
Leathers, McPherson v.............. 65
Lemonds et al., Jenkins, Admr.
&c. V.........

...

....294

Lemonds, et al., The State, ex rel.

Judah V........

.........437
Lighty et al. v. Overbay's Admr..433
Logansport, City of, Musselman v.533
Low v. Weaver, Guardian of Low 57
Lowe et al. v. Hughes ..........
Lowe, The Indianapolis &c. R. R.
Co. V.............................
Loyd v. Reynolds et al..
Ludwick, Stewart v......

M

..399

...545

.299 .........230