| 1843 - 506 str.
...is barred by the statute of limitations. Trusts which are not affected by the statute of limitations are those technical and continuing trusts which are not cognizable at law, but fall within the proper, peculiar, and exclusive jurisdiction of a court of equity. Finney v. Cochran,... | |
| T. M. Lalor, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1833 - 712 str.
...decisions is undoubtedly the correct one: that the trusts not to be reached or affected by the statute are, those technical and continuing trusts which are not cognizable at law, but fall within the proper, peculiar and exclusive jurisdiction of this court. On the other hand, the position... | |
| Pennsylvania. Supreme Court, Frederick Watts, Henry Jonathan Sergeant - 1842 - 614 str.
...Presbyterian Congregation v. Johnston, 9. 2. Trusts which are not affected by the Statute of Limitations are those technical and continuing trusts, which are not cognizable at law, but fall within the proper, peculiar, and exclusive jurisdiction of a court of equity. Finney v. Cuchran,... | |
| 1853 - 732 str.
...trusts not affected by statutes of limitation, are those technical and continuing trusts not at all cognizable at law, but which fall within the peculiar and exclusive jurisdiction of courts of equity. All trusts which are cognizable at law, are not withdrawn from the operations of... | |
| 1884 - 876 str.
...trusts, not affected by statutes of limitation, are those technical and continuing trusts not at all cognizable at law, but which fall within the peculiar and exclusive jurisdiction of courts of equity: Id. 111. All trusts which are cognizable at law are not withdrawn from the operation... | |
| 1884 - 542 str.
...Barton v. Dickens, 12 Wright, 518, that the trusts not reached or affected by the statute of limitation are those technical and continuing trusts which are not cognizable at law, but fall within the proper and exclusive jurisdiction of a court of equity. On page 523 AGNEW, J., said... | |
| 1884 - 628 str.
...Barton v. Dickens (12 Wr. 518), that the trusts not reached or affected by the Statute of Limitation are those technical and continuing trusts which are not cognizable at law but fall within the proper and exclusive jurisdiction of a court of equity. On page 523, AGNEW, J., said... | |
| Isaac Grant Thompson - 1885 - 912 str.
...v. Dickens, 48 Penn. St. 518, that the trusts not reached or affected by the statute of limitations are those technical and continuing trusts which are not cognizable at law but fall within the proper and exclusive jurisdiction of a court of equity. On page 523 AGNEW, J., said:... | |
| 1886 - 948 str.
...pawner and pawnee, principal and agent, are all cases of express trust; yet such cases are not taken out of the statute of limitations when sued at law, and...the peculiar and exclusive jurisdiction of chancery. The foregoing will be found cited with approval in App v. Dreisbach, 2 Rawle, 302, where there is an... | |
| 1886 - 1010 str.
...aiid pawnee, principal and agent, are all cases of express trust ; yet such cases are not taken out of the statute of limitations when sued at law, and...the peculiar and exclusive jurisdiction of chancery. The foregoing will be found cited with approval in App v. Dreinbach, 2 Rawle, at page 302, where there... | |
| |