 | Michigan. Constitutional Convention - 1850 - 990 str.
...final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal. Sec. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Michigan - 1850 - 40 str.
...the final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal § 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Virginia - 1851 - 1348 str.
...his religious instructor, aud to make for his support such private contract as. be shall please. 16. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in it* title ; nor shall any law be revived or amended by reference to its title, but the act revived... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1890 - 784 str.
...claimed that the statute is unconstitutional, nnder Article 4, § 20, of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. The section of Howell's Statutes, 9175, was added to our criminal laws by Act No. 116, Laws of 1867. The... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1893 - 800 str.
...upon." This act took immediate effect. Section 20, art. 4, of the Constitution of this State provides that " no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." .The purpose of the act evidently is to enable cities and townships to acquire, either by purchase or condemnation,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 824 str.
...aimed at the title. It is said the title is invalid because it violates the constitutional provision that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." Art. 5, § 21. The title reads as follows: "An* act to regulate and prohibit false, deceptive, fraudulent... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909 - 790 str.
...this amendment comes within the prohibition of section 20, art. 4, of the Constitution then in force. "No law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." The amendment is inconsistent with, and outside of the purpose indicated by, the title of the original... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1922 - 818 str.
...title. Id. 4. Nor does said act violate section 21, Art. 5, of the State Constitution, which requires that "no law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title." Id. See CRIMINAL LAW (21, 37); INSURANCE (24); INTOXICATING LIQUORS (13); MASTER AND SERVANT (6); MUNICIPAL... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1886 - 744 str.
...Court upon four grounds, namely : First. That it is in conflict with the provision of the Constitution that " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." Second. That it violates another provision of the Constitution, to wit : " No law shall be revised,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1868 - 610 str.
...subject of a single act It does not conflict with that provision of the constitution which declares that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. — Inktter i>. Career, 484. As to rights and remedies: See TAX TITLES, 1. CONTRACT. 1. Rescission... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title... 
