 | Peyton Randolph, Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1828 - 760 str.
...v. Baird, 1 Hen. & Munf. 25, which followed very shortly after, the same principle is declared, viz: "that the District Court had no power or jurisdiction...had been entered on the order book, and signed by the Judge in open Court." This last case was, no doubt, founded on the authority of Vaughan Sf Field... | |
 | Jacob D. Wheeler - 1833 - 646 str.
...District Court has no power to al- Contra .in ter, or amend a judgment, given at a former term of that court, " •which had .been entered on the order book, and signed by a judge in the open Court. 16. GREEN v. DODGE, ET AL. 1828. 3 Hammond's Ohio Rep. p. 488. Held by the Court, that... | |
 | Theron Metcalf, Jonathan Cogswell Perkins - 1860 - 746 str.
...A superior court of law has no power or jurisdiction to reverse, alter, or amend a judgment giveji at a former term of the said court, which had been entered on the order-book, and signed by a judge in open court. Hatley v. Baird, 1 H. & M. 25. 371. During the term,... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals, Edgar P. Rucker - 1893 - 950 str.
...24, it was held that the "district court has no .power or jurisdiction to reverse, alter or amend a judgment given at a former term of the said court which had been entered on the order-book, and signed by a judge in open court." Upon the other band, in Shelton \. Wcla/i, 1 Leigh,... | |
 | 1902 - 796 str.
...court has no power or jurisdiction to reverse, alter or amend a judgment given at a former term of the court, which had been entered on the order book, and signed by a judge In open court. Halley v. Baird, 1 H. & M. 24. Correction by Same Court.— For an error In the judgment of a court... | |
 | 1903 - 1018 str.
...Term.*— A District Court has no power or jurisdiction to reverse, alter or amend a judgment liivcn at a former term of the said Court, which had been entered on the order book, and slg-ned by a Judie In opea Court. •Judgment— Amendment at Subsequent Term.— In Gordon v. Frazier,... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1913 - 774 str.
...Va.) 24, it was held, that a district court has no power or jurisdiction to reverse, alter or- amend a judgment given at a former term of the said court,...the order book and signed by a judge in open court. In Barbour Co. v. O'Neal, 42 W. Va. 295, it was held that after the end of the term the court has no... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1913 - 1008 str.
...Opinion. 25, it was held that a district court has no power or jurisdiction to reverse, alter or amend a judgment given at a former term of the said court,...the order book and signed by a judge in open court. In Barbour Co. v. O'Neal, 42 W. Va. 295, 26 SE 182, it was held that after the end of the term the... | |
 | 1913 - 1290 str.
...1 Hen. & M. (11 Va.) 25, it was held that a district court baa no power or jurisdiction to reverse, term of the said court, which had been entered on...the order book and signed by a judge In open court. In Barbour Co. v. O'Neal, 42 W. Va. 29.1, 26 SE 182, it was held that after the end of the term the... | |
| |
Va.) 24, it was held, that a district court has no power or jurisdiction to reverse, alter or- amend a judgment given at a former term of the said court, which had- been entered on the order book and signed by a judge in open court. 