Obrázky stránek
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

See Debtor and Creditor, 1.

GIN.

ib.

[blocks in formation]

INDORSEMENT. See Writ.

INDORSER.

ib.

2. Where the indorsee of a note sues the maker and indorser jointly, under the act of 1828, defining the liability of indorsers, if he discontinue as to the maker, he not being found, it is a discontinuance as to both. Philips v. Jordan.

38

3. B. and A. signed, as indorsers, under the name of T, whose name was there before, the paper being blank. It was afterwards filled as a note, payable to B. and A.; the indorsements were filled, making them first indorsers, and T. as second. R., the holder, obtained judgment, at law, against each, as indorsers; T. satisfied to R. the demand, and obtained a transfer of the judgment against B and A., who then filed their bill for relief against it. T. shewed that, although judgment had been rendered against him, his indorsement was, in fact, a forgery, and he claimed the amount: It was held, that the judgment against T. was conclusive of 'T.'s liability as between R. and him, but was not evidence as between him and B. and A., they not being parties nor privies, but strangers. Brahan and Atwood v Ragland et al. 247 4. It was immaterial to B. and A. whether the signature of T. was genuine or not, they having no equity against him. ib. 5. The liability of B. and A was as first indorsers. 6. Where one pays money which another was equally bound to pay, and received an equal benefit, contribution will be allowed.

ib.

ib.

[blocks in formation]

9. Where the indorser of a promissory note holds himself liable to the indorsee, "should the maker fail," this is a different contract from a general indorsement, and must be specially declared on.-Davis & Co. v. Campbell.

319

291

1. In an action against the indorser of a pro

missory note under the statute of 1812, 11. And proof of the indorser's subsequent

jndgment by default final may be rendered without a jury. -Malone & Co. v. Hath

10. The word fail," in such indorsement is is of larger import than "refuse," and is equivalent to inability or insolvency of the principal, and such fact must be shewn by the indorsee, as ascertained by suit or oth

erwise.

ib.

promise to pay is inadmissible, the declaration not being adapted to such a state of

fact.

ib.

away.

: INDEX.

[blocks in formation]

INSOLVENT ESTATE.

See Executors and Administrators, 2.
Practice, 25.

INTEREST.

ib.

1. The damages given on the affirmance of judgment, in the circuit or supreme court bear interest till paid.-Sanders & Fenwick v. Rives.

509

6. Under the act of 1819, a judgment on mo tion may be had against the sureties of a sheriff, on notice to the sheriff alone.Neal et al. v. Caldwell. 134

7. Where the court below has erred, but the record shews, that, on another ground the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, the court will not reverse a judgment obtained by the defendant below. -Johnson, Ad. v. Wren. 172

8. On a note payable at a future day, with interest from the date, if not punctually paid, judgment may be properly rendered for the principal, with interest from maturity. Boddie v. Ely.

182.

[blocks in formation]

10. Where an error was committed in the court below, but the appellant has suffered no injury thereby, the judgment will not be reversed. - M'Millian v. Wallace.

11. In trials of title, the parties are entitled to a jury of free-holders, but that right must be claimed in the court below, and it is not sufficient to reverse the judgment, that the record does not shew that the jurors were such - Hamner v. Eddins 192

109 12. And the judgment though informal, if it adjudges to the plaintiff the damages found by the jury, and a writ of possession for the land is sufficient. ib.

2. On a note payable at a future day, with interest from the date, if not punctualty paid, judgment may be properly rendered for the principal, with interest from maturity.-Boddie v. Ely. 182

See I, Declaration, 4. 5.

JUDGMENT.

[blocks in formation]

1. Judgment by default final may be render 14. A judgment by default against an execu

ed against an indorser, without a jury.Malone & Co. v. Hathaway.

29

2. A judgment in assumpsit, will not be reversed, because rendered as for debtand damages, instead of damages only.

3. Where a judgment is improper, but produces the proper result, it should not be reversed.-Philips v. Jordan.

285

ib.

tor and return of execution, " no property found," are conclusive evidence of a devastavit, to the amount of the judgment in a second action by the same plaintiff against him, in his individual capacity, suggesting a devastavit.-Garrow v. Emanuel.

33 15. Although pleas are on file, judgment of nil dicit may be rendered, and such judgment authorises the presumption that the defendant was present by himself or counsel, and did not attempt ro sustain his pleas. Bryant v. J. & T. Simpson, surv. part's. 339

4. Judgment of affirmance may be rendered in this court on certificate, in cases of appeal, as well of writs of error.-Adams v. Adams.

57

5. Under the act of 1811, making it penal to mark unmarked cattle, &c.; a judgment 16. Where, under the statute of 1818, maker

final on demurrer cannot be rendered; the penalty can be recovered only on a trial on the merits, on proof or confession of the guilt of the defendant.-Reagh v. Spann.100

and indorser are joined in the same action, and the maker appears and continues the case as to him, and there is judgment by default against the indorser, this judg

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

2. After verdict, in criminal cases, it is presumable that the names of the jurors, specified in the venire facias, have been drawn according to law, particularly when the writ expresses that they were "good and lawful jurors, duly appointed as the statute requires."-State v. Williams. 454 3. It is not necessary that the return of the venire facias should be technically stated in the record; if it appear that the writ issued and that the grand jury was composed of persons named in the writ, it will be presumed they are the same, and it is immaterial whether they were summoned or not.

ib.

4. În a capital case, it is not ground of peremptory challenge of a juror, that he has

formed, upon eommon report, and expres. ed an opinion of the guilt of the prisoner, if the juror believes that such opinion would have no influence in the formatiou of his verdict, should the evidence on the trial be different from the report of the facts. ib.

5. After a juror is accepted and sworn, the court cannot discharge him from the panel, without the consent of the prisoner, for any cause in esse at the time he was sworn although the cause may have been discovered after he was empannelled.

ib.

6. And where a juror is so erroneously discharged, and the prisoner is convicted, a reversal of the judgment does not discharge him from a second trial. See Judgment, 1 11.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE.

ib.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

2. Bat it does not commence running until
some one is entitled to sue or be sued.-
Therefore, in trover, the statute does not
commence running against an adıministra-
tor, until administration is granted, where
the defendant acquired the property after
the death of the intestate.

ib.

MOTION.

1. A motion to strike out a plea is addressed
to the discretion of the court, and its refu-
sal is not revisable on error.-Johnson,
Adm'r v. Wren.

172

2. Motions to set aside office judgnient: dur-
ing the term in which they are perfected,
are aderessed to the sound discretion of
the court, from which there is no appeal.
Acre v. Ross, Adm'r.

See Writ of Error, 1. 2.
Shcriff's' Securities, 1.

NONSUIT.

288

1. Whether the court can order a non-suit,
Quere.-Philips v. Jordan.

NOTICE.

See Sheriff's' sccurities, 1.

Executors and Administrators, 6.
Titles to Land, 3. 4.
II. Pleas. 1. 2.5.
Principal and surety, 3.

Vendor and Purchaser, 4. 5. 6.

OFFICE FOUND

See Alien, 1.

PARTNERSHIP.

38

1. In assumpsit against partners, under the
common counts, proof of a promise by one
in the firm name, is not sufficient: there

must be a joint promise proved, or proof
of the existence of the partnership.-Find-
lay & Buckhannon v. Stevenson

48

3. Whether the statute of limitations, where
pleaded by an executor or administrator. 2. It is not necessary, in such case, for a de-

will not be received more favorably than
in other cases, Semble.-Acre v. Ross, Ad.

See Practice, 19.

LOST NOTE.

fendant to deny the partnership by-plea in
abatement.
ib.

288 3. After the dissolution of a firm, the declar-
ation of a defendant that his co-defendant
was a partner and jointly bound with him,
is no evidence.-Barringer and Rhodes v.

1. An action at law may be maintained on a
note payable to order, which is lost, where
it does not appear to have been negotiated
or indorsed.- Chaudron v. Hunt & Norris.

31

Sneed.

201

[blocks in formation]

2. And where the declaration on such note
avers its execution, its contents and its loss,
and that it is still due the plaintiff, it is suffi-
cient. It need not aver, that it was not in-
dorsed when lost, nor whether lost before
or after due.

MILITARY TITLE
See Annuity, 1.

ib.

PAYMENT.

1. Where, pending a writ of error, money is
deposited with the sheriff, (who holds an
execution,) to be applied to the satisfac-
tion of a judgment in case of affirmance,
it is not a payment-it is at the risk of the

1

512

INDEX.

payor. Sanders and Fenwick v. Rires. 109

readiness to pay is surplusage. -Weaver,

2. Payment of part of the purchase money

Adm'rv. Childress.

361

is not, of itself, a sufficient part perform- 7. In declaring on a contract, it must be set

ance to enable the vendor to enforce a

parol contract for the sale of land, and
recover at law, the remainder of the pur-
chase money. - Meridith v. Naish.

out literally, or described according to its
legal effect: in the latter mode, a substan-

tial variance in the proof is fatal.-Daris

207

& Co. v. Campbell.

319

See Lost Note, 1.

See III. Written Evidence, 3.
IV, Parol Evidence, 4.

PENALTY.

See Justice of the peace, 1.

[blocks in formation]

Corenant, 3.
Darnages, 3.
Indorser, 9.

II. PLEAS.

1. To a suit brought by an administrator the
defendant may plead, as a set-off, a de-
mand due by the intestate, at the time of
his death, although the estate has been
declared insolvent.-Perrine v. Warren,
Adm'r.
151

2. The same strictness, either as to form or
sub-tance, essential to a special plea. is
not necessary to a notice of set-off; it is
sufficient if it describe the demand intend-
ed to be set off, with reasonable certainty.

[blocks in formation]

4. In debt on a note payable at a future 5. In an action on an assigned bond, it is not

day, with interest from the date, if not
punctually paid, though the interest be
demanded in the declaration from the date,
yet, it not being demanded as a part of the
debt itself, the declaration is sufficient.-
Boddie v. Ely.
182

a good plea for the obligor, that the as-
signment was extorted from the obligee,
by threats of a prosecution for felony, not-
withstanding the former was notified by
the latter of the fraud, and required not
to pay the coutents of the bond to the as-
signee.-M'Causland v. Druke.

344

5. A declaration founded on an instrument,
for the payment of a sum certain, togeth- 6. A., holding a bond on B., placed it for
er with costs of suit and interest, the
amount of which is not specified in the
instrument nor averred in the declaration,
will authorise the recovery of the sum
certain, and interest thereon.-Bryant v.
J. and T. Simpson, sureiring partners. 3:39
6. In a suit brought by A. after the time when
he was to make title to B. had elapsed, to
recover the purchase money of B., who
is presumed to be in possession, an aver-
ment in the declaration, of A's ability and

collection in the hands of C., an attorney
at law-the attorney, being indebted to
D., in conjunction with the latter, prevail-
ed with B., in consideration of a surren
der to him of his bond, to A., and a prom-
ise from them that the attorney would sat-
isfy A. therefor. to execute a bond to said
D. for the amount of, and in discharge of,
his bond to A. D. brought suit ou the last
mentioned bond against B., who pleaded
the foregoing facts, and, in addition, that

1

« PředchozíPokračovat »