« PředchozíPokračovat »
XX. PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES AND ASSOCIA
386 388 388
1. TREATY OF PEACE WITH GERMANY .
297 (a) The Covenant of the League of Nations
303 (b) Selected Articles from the Treaty
315 (c) Labor Organization
366 2. THE TRIPLE ALLIANCE
383 (a) Dual Alliance, October 7, 1879
383 (b) Triple Alliance, May, 1882 3. Russo-FRENCH ALLIANCE
(a) Projet de Convention Militaire, December, 1893
· 390 4. THE HOLY ALLIANCE ACT
391 5. CENTRAL AMERICAN TREATIES, December 20, 1907 393 (a) General Treaty of Peace and Amity
393 (b) Convention for the Establishment of a Central American Court of Justice
399 (c) Convention for the Establishment of an International Central American Bureau
406 (d) Convention Concerning Future Central American Conferences.
409 6. HAGUE CONVENTIONS AND DRAFTS, 1907
411 (a) Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes
411 (b) Draft Convention Relative to the Creation of a Judicial Arbitration Court
431 (c) Convention Relative to the Creation of an Inter
national Prize Court
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GUATEMALA,
455 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
I. THE SOCIETY OF NATIONS IN 1914
THE SOCIETY OF NATIONS IN 1914
The expression “League of Nations” as the name for the new international régime which was created by Part I of the Treaty of Versailles was not adopted without some dissent. Leagues of the past have not all had a beneficent influence, and some of the bloodiest wars in history have been waged in their name. To France particularly the term is of sinister meaning, associated as it is with her devastating religious wars of the sixteenth century. Her statesmen preferred the name “society” to indicate a voluntary association of equals drawn together for a common purpose. Société, not ligue, is therefore used in the French version of the treaty as the equivalent of “league.” A society is something more than an association by agreement. It is the result of natural development; while a league has connected with it something of the idea of politics. Usage justifies the use of the word "nations” as synonymous with the word "states" to signify the politically organized communities which enter into international relations. Up to the time of Jeremy Bentham the rules applicable to these relations were collectively called the law of nations, and the expression coined by him, (international law, apparently settled the usage for all time. But, legally speaking, a state and a nation are not the same. This is now a commonplace in popular works on the League of Nations as it has long been in technical works on international law.
A state is defined as a sovereign political unity. It occupies a specified territory inhabited by people who owe allegiance to it, are protected by it, and who, as a unity, have no means of expressing themselves except through the agencies of state organization. A nation is less easily defined. By itself, it is neither sovereign, political, nor organized. Its unity comes from ties of blood, language, religion, customs, literature, and history. Races are neither states nor nations; they are ethnographical divisions of the world's population, such as the Caucasian, Mongolian, Ethiopian, and Malay races, and they are so widely scattered that scarcely any state or any nation is wholly composed of one race. It is possible, of course, for a nation to be organized into a state, thus adding the characteristics of one to the other. The attempt has been made in the re-mapping of Europe to make states out of national groups, and France was already an example of a state almost co-terminous with a nation. On the other hand, the British Empire is made up of many nationalities; so also is the United States. Switzerland is an example of a small state made up of several well-defined national groups, the chief of which have undoubted ties of blood, language, and literature with Germany, Italy, and France respectively. These have not yet been completely amalgamated into a Swiss nation, but the status of Switzerland as a state is not thereby affected.
In the Preamble of the League of Nations Covenant the word "nation” is synonymous with "state". It speaks of just and honorable relations between “nations", of the dealings of "organized peoples”, and rules of conduct for “governments” which are the political organs of states. Only self-governing states, dominions, or colonies may be members of the League, thus excluding from direct representation national groups which are not sepa
Ruyssen (International Conciliation, March, 1917, p. 71-72) distinguishes between nation and nationality. “Nationality,” he says, “in the abstract sense, is the characteristic of that which is national. But it is also, especially in the concrete sense, the totality of those ethnical elements which aspire to the dignity, the risks and the thrilling experiences of national life. Nationality is the nation in power, the nation attempting to realize itself and to play a part in history. It is made of similar but dissevered elements which would unite to form a common body and give it the functions necessary to a common life, in a word, to achieve unity and political sovereignty:
“Unquestionably, the distinction between these ideas is frequently vague; 'nation' and 'nationality may be used interchangeably to designate the same ethnic group. We may give the name of nation not only to existing states, where political unity visibly corresponds with a unity of homogeneous ethnical characteristics, but also to those states which have been deprived by the accident of history of this unity within such comparatively recent times that its memory still remains as an ideal for restoration."