 The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence. It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond in that value for Opinion of...  The Pacific Reporter - Strana 3301910Úplné zobrazení - Podrobnosti o knize
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 str.
...value, see Mears v. Railroad Co., 75 Conn. 171 (52 Atl. 610, 56 LRA 884, 96 Am. St. Rep. 192). That this limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence, see Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Hubbard, 72 Ohio St. 302 (74 NE 214) ; Alair v. Railroad Co., 53 Minn.... | |
 | 1885 - 544 str.
...asked the value of the horses, and had been told by the plaintiff the sum inserted in the contract. The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...based on that value. The shipper is estopped from aayiug that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value for the purposes of the contract... | |
 | 1892 - 582 str.
...contract under consideration, for, as stated by Blatchford, J., in Hart v. Railroad Co., 112 US 331, 340, "The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carriers the measure of care due to the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond in that value... | |
 | 1892 - 554 str.
...as to value, even where the loss or injury has occurred through the negligence of the carrier. * * * The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence. It exacts from the carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1905 - 830 str.
...limit on the amount of liability for which the carrier should respond in case of loss or damage. "This limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from...liability for negligence. It does not induce want of care. The carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 844 str.
...asked the value of the horses, and had been told by the plaintiff the sum inserted in the contract. The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...The carrier is bound to respond in that value for Opinion of the Court. negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper... | |
 | 1885 - 544 str.
...asked the value of the horses, and had been told by the plaintiff the sum inserted in the contract. The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond iu that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper is... | |
 | 1885 - 1232 str.
...asked the value of the horses, and had been told by the plaintiff the sum inserted in the contract. The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negrt ligence. It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carrier the * measure of care due... | |
| |
