Report of the Late Important Trial in the Court of King's Bench: In which Sir Charles Merrik Burrell was Plaintiff, and Henry John Nicholson, the Defendant : Respecting the Parochial Rates Claimed by the Parish of St. Margaret, Westminster, from the Inhabitants of Richmond TerraceJ.B. Nichols, 1834 - Počet stran: 191 |
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
Abbot and Convent Abbot of Westminster aforesaid afterwards ancient palace appurtenances Archbishop of York Bent's Wharf Bishop boundary mark chapel church conveyance conveyed Court Crown Dean and Chapter deed defendant Duke of Portland Duke of Richmond Earl entry evidence exemption extra-parochial Gentlemen grant Gray's Gray's Inn Henry the Eighth Henry the Third house?-A Hubert de Burgh John Jury King Street land leases Lord Chief Justice.-I Lord Mansfield Lord the King Lordship Margaret messuage minster Odo the goldsmith palace of Whitehall parcel parish mark parish of St Parliament Street parochial party perambulations persons plaintiff poor's rates premises Privy Garden proved recollect reign Richmond Gardens Richmond House Richmond Terrace Roger de Ware sewer shew Sir Charles Burrell Sir James Scarlett Sir James Scarlett.-I Solicitor Thames there?-A Thomas town of Westminster verdict wall Westminster Bridge Whitehall Palace Whitehall Stairs William York Place
Oblíbené pasáže
Strana 158 - No. 2. J Church, to whom the present writing shall come, Richard, by the grace of God, Abbot of Westminster, and the whole Convent of the same place, health in the Lord. Be it known to you all, that We have given and .... to Hubert de Burgh, Justicier of England, all our houses
Strana 166 - Mr. Follett.—There is another to the Duke of Montague of the 5th of March, 1742. Mr. Watson.—It recites former letters patent and then it demises leases, and to farm let all that piece or parcel of ground situate, lying, and being in our Privy Garden abutting east on a passage eight foot wide. Mr.
Strana 30 - the document.) The document was put in and read as follows: Amongst the Records of the Court of Chancery preserved in the Tower of London, (that is to say,) On the Roll of the Charts
Strana 84 - Q. What is the title of that book ?—It is the account of the churchwardens and overseers of the poor of the parish of St. Margaret, Westminster. The Solicitor General.—The question is whether this book is receivable in evidence, and whatever the effect of it may be, I apprehend there can be no doubt as to
Strana 76 - then and there died. And the jurors aforesaid, upon their oath aforesaid, do say, that the said .Sarah Ryley, not being of sound mind, memory, and unVerge, in the County
Strana 29 - Amongst the records of the Court of Chancery preserved in the Tower of London, (that is to say,) On the Roll of the
Strana 35 - presumption or inference where no direct evidence can be had. This, then, is the next best evidence; and perhaps evidence still more inferior might have been admitted if this could not have been produced.
Strana 160 - document was read, as follows : Among the records preserved in the Treasury of the Court of Receipt of the Exchequer (that is to say) amongst the records, documents, and other papers belonging to Cardinal Wolsey, Archbishop of York, in a book indorsed " Certayn Reparations done uppo' York Place,
Strana 2 - The Solicitor General.—The old doctrine is, that the person on whom the affirmative lies, is to begin. This is not a question of damages, it is a question of right. Now, being a question of right, on whom does the affirmative
Strana 35 - of reputation, and matter of reputation connected with any quarter, or connected with either side, would in that case have been evidence; and a dispute between the Abbot of Westminster and the Bishop of London, respecting the jurisdiction of the Bishop in the parish of St. Margaret, Westminster, would have been direct evidence upon that subject of reputation respecting the limits of the parish, and the origin of another parish