 | Kentucky - 1851 - 544 str.
...substituted by the party withdrawing the originals. CHAPTER 8. Mistakes in pleading, and amendments. § 182. No variance between the allegation in a pleading and...his action or defense upon the merits. Whenever it is alledged that a party has been so misled, that fact must be shown to the satisfaction of the court,... | |
 | Kentucky - 1851 - 548 str.
...substituted by the party withdrawing the originals. CHAPTER 8. Mistakes in pleading, and amendments. § 182. No variance between the allegation in a pleading and...his action or defense upon the merits. Whenever it is alledged that a party has been so misled, that fact must be shown to the satisfaction of the court,... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1860 - 620 str.
...here. Section 169 declares that no variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof shall be deemed material, unless it has actually misled...party to his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defence upon the merits, and governs referees as well as courts whenever questions of variance arise.... | |
 | New York (State) - 1863 - 1026 str.
...variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof, shall be deemed material, unless it have actually misled the adverse party, to his prejudice,...his action or defense, upon the merits. Whenever it shall be alleged, that a party has been so misled, that fact shall be proved to the satisfaction of... | |
 | John Townshend - 1864 - 320 str.
...variance between the allegation in a pleading am! the proof shall be deemed material, unless it have actually misled the adverse party, to his prejudice,...his action or defense, upon the merits. Whenever it shall be alleged that a party has been so misled, that fact shall be proved to the satisfaction of... | |
 | California, Creed Haymond, John Chilton Burch, John Hill McKune - 1872 - 886 str.
...allegation Material in a pleading and the proof is to be deemed material, how pro-' unless it have actually misled the adverse party to his prejudice,...his action or defense upon the merits. Whenever it is alleged that a party has been so misled, that fact must be proved to the satisfaction of the Court,... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1872 - 568 str.
...variance between the allegation in a pleading and the prool shall be deemed material, unless it have actually misled the adverse party to his prejudice,...his action (or defense) upon the merits. Whenever it shall be alleged that a party has been so misled, that fact shall be proved to the satisfaction of... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1881 - 802 str.
...the court in arresting the case from the jury, and in directing a nonsuit. The code provides, that no variance between the allegation in a pleading and...actually misled the adverse party to his prejudice, in maintainIJarnett r. Ward. ing his action or defense on the merits. Whenever it is alleged that a party... | |
 | William Wait - 1873 - 950 str.
...the provision of the Code, that no variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof shall be deemed material, unless it has actually misled...maintaining his action or defense upon the merits, and the subsequent provisions in relation to amendments in such cases. But the general rules in relation... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1884 - 806 str.
...5294 of the Revised Statutes, " No variance between the allegation in a pleading, and the proof shall be deemed material, unless it has actually misled...maintaining his action or defense upon the merits, and when it is alleged that a party has been so misled, that fact must be proved to the satisfaction... | |
| |
No variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof is to be deemed material, unless it has actually misled the adverse party to his prejudice in maintaining his action or defense upon the merits. Whenever it appears that a party has been so... 
