Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 34The Board, 1982 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 4
... Board finds the case is not in posture for decision . It is well established that the employee initially has the burden of establishing that a disabling condition was caused or adversely affected by the employment.1 Appellant attempted ...
... Board finds the case is not in posture for decision . It is well established that the employee initially has the burden of establishing that a disabling condition was caused or adversely affected by the employment.1 Appellant attempted ...
Strana 12
... findings resulted in no greater impairment than that determined in his June 7 , 1980 sched- ule award . The Board finds that appellant has no more than a 20 percent perma- nent impairment of his right leg and 19 percent permanent ...
... findings resulted in no greater impairment than that determined in his June 7 , 1980 sched- ule award . The Board finds that appellant has no more than a 20 percent perma- nent impairment of his right leg and 19 percent permanent ...
Strana 13
United States. Employees' Compensation Appeals Board. ule award . However , as the Office has not yet issued a final decision on this issue , it is not before the Board on this appeal.3 The Board further finds that the evidence does not ...
United States. Employees' Compensation Appeals Board. ule award . However , as the Office has not yet issued a final decision on this issue , it is not before the Board on this appeal.3 The Board further finds that the evidence does not ...
Strana 37
... Board finds that the weight of the medical evidence , as repre- sented by the February 20 , 1980 and March 24 , 1981 reports from Dr. Martin A. Blaker , a Board - certified orthopedic surgeon , supports the Office's decision to ...
... Board finds that the weight of the medical evidence , as repre- sented by the February 20 , 1980 and March 24 , 1981 reports from Dr. Martin A. Blaker , a Board - certified orthopedic surgeon , supports the Office's decision to ...
Strana 38
... Board finds that the case is not in posture for decision as to waiver of the $ 1241.43 overpayment of benefits . Section 8129 ( b ) of the Federal Employees ' Compensation Act pro- vides that " adjustment or recovery by the United ...
... Board finds that the case is not in posture for decision as to waiver of the $ 1241.43 overpayment of benefits . Section 8129 ( b ) of the Federal Employees ' Compensation Act pro- vides that " adjustment or recovery by the United ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted facts aggravation alleged appellant's appellant's claim appellant's condition appellant's disability April artery asbestosis audiogram August August 18 Board finds Board-certified orthopedic surgeon causal relationship causally related claimant compensation order dated continuation of pay December degenerative determined diagnosed disc disease Docket ECAB employee employee's employing establishment employment injury employment-related evaluation exposure February February 23 federal employment filed a claim GERALD LAMBOLEY hearing loss indicated that appellant internist issue January January 22 July June June 24 knee light duty loss of wage-earning low back lumbar lumbosacral March March 23 medical adviser reviewed medical evidence ment myocardial infarction November November 26 novo decision October Office hearing representative Office medical adviser Office of Workers Office referred appellant Office's opined osteoarthritis overpayment pain patient percent period physician pulmonary remanded report dated report from Dr schedule award September September 18 specialist spine statement of accepted symptoms tion U.S. Postal Service wage-earning capacity x-rays