Decisions of the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board, Svazek 34The Board, 1982 |
Vyhledávání v knize
Výsledky 1-5 z 100
Strana 5
... appellant's request for such was not made within 30 days , he has no statu- tory right to a hearing . However , the Office may within its discretionary powers grant or deny appellant's request for a hearing made more than 30 days after ...
... appellant's request for such was not made within 30 days , he has no statu- tory right to a hearing . However , the Office may within its discretionary powers grant or deny appellant's request for a hearing made more than 30 days after ...
Strana 40
... appellant's schedule award using the correct rate of pay . At the time of appellant's work injury , his rate of pay was $ 4.33 per hour plus 10 percent of his base pay for Sunday differential . Appellant's rate of pay was $ 4.33 per ...
... appellant's schedule award using the correct rate of pay . At the time of appellant's work injury , his rate of pay was $ 4.33 per hour plus 10 percent of his base pay for Sunday differential . Appellant's rate of pay was $ 4.33 per ...
Strana 47
... appellant's compensation . The Office originally accepted that appellant's angina pectoris and cardiomegaly were employment related . The Office based its decision to terminate compensation on the reports of two Board- certified ...
... appellant's compensation . The Office originally accepted that appellant's angina pectoris and cardiomegaly were employment related . The Office based its decision to terminate compensation on the reports of two Board- certified ...
Strana 53
... appellant's obstructive pulmonary disease precluded any accurate evalua- tion of appellant's coronary artery disease , and he was unable to resolve the questions concerning appellant's angina pectoris . Dr. Collinsworth interpreted Dr ...
... appellant's obstructive pulmonary disease precluded any accurate evalua- tion of appellant's coronary artery disease , and he was unable to resolve the questions concerning appellant's angina pectoris . Dr. Collinsworth interpreted Dr ...
Strana 73
... appellant's injury occurred on November 27 , 1978. He asserted that appellant's claim , therefore , was filed within the appropriate time limit . The Office , in a June 27 , 1979 letter , responded that appellant , in his own hand , had ...
... appellant's injury occurred on November 27 , 1978. He asserted that appellant's claim , therefore , was filed within the appropriate time limit . The Office , in a June 27 , 1979 letter , responded that appellant , in his own hand , had ...
Další vydání - Zobrazit všechny
Běžně se vyskytující výrazy a sousloví
accepted facts aggravation alleged appellant's appellant's claim appellant's condition appellant's disability April artery asbestosis audiogram August August 18 Board finds Board-certified orthopedic surgeon causal relationship causally related claimant compensation order dated continuation of pay December degenerative determined diagnosed disc disease Docket ECAB employee employee's employing establishment employment injury employment-related evaluation exposure February February 23 federal employment filed a claim GERALD LAMBOLEY hearing loss indicated that appellant internist issue January January 22 July June June 24 knee light duty loss of wage-earning low back lumbar lumbosacral March March 23 medical adviser reviewed medical evidence ment myocardial infarction November November 26 novo decision October Office hearing representative Office medical adviser Office of Workers Office referred appellant Office's opined osteoarthritis overpayment pain patient percent period physician pulmonary remanded report dated report from Dr schedule award September September 18 specialist spine statement of accepted symptoms tion U.S. Postal Service wage-earning capacity x-rays